Usage Score
14.1
Player Dossier
2016-2017TCU
DE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Torrance, CA, USA
Mat Boesen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
14.1
Efficiency
41.3
Consistency
37.9
Season Value
48.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mat Boesen, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · TCU. Mat Boesen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.3 disruption score.
Mat Boesen played DE for TCU. Across 2 tracked seasons, Mat Boesen recorded 92 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with TCU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
TCU paired 34.5 primary output with 41.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 41.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.7
Efficiency
41.3
Usage
14.1
Consistency
37.9
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 3.5. Jackson State: 0.5. Arkansas: 0. SMU: 1. Oklahoma State: 2. West Virginia: 1. Kansas State: 2. Kansas: 3. Iowa State: 2. Texas: 2. Texas Tech: 3. Baylor: 12. Oklahoma: 2.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 7 by 64.2. Jackson State: 7 by 34.2. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 6 by 35. Oklahoma State: 4 by 36.7. West Virginia: 5 by 30.8. Kansas State: 4 by 36.7. Kansas: 3 by 42.5. Iowa State: 3 by 32.5. Texas: 2 by 28.3. Texas Tech: 5 by 50.8. Baylor: 10 by 91.7. Oklahoma: 5 by 45.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Baylor
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs StanfordSplash game | W 39-37 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ OklahomaSplash game | L 17-41 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Baylor10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | W 45-22 | 10 | 8 | — | 5.50 | 5.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Texas TechSplash game | W 27-3 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs TexasSplash game | W 24-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Iowa StateSplash game | L 7-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/22 | vs KansasSplash game | W 43-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | W 26-6 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs West Virginia | W 31-24 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Oklahoma StateSplash game | W 44-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs SMU | W 56-36 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Arkansas | W 28-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Jackson State | W 63-0 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | TCU | 16 | 28.1 | 7.3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 16 | 28.1 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | TCU | 34.5 | 41.3 | 14.1 | 18.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 34.5 | 41.3 | 14.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
12
Primary metric
12 disruption/tackle impact with 76.3 takeover score.
#2
Texas Tech
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 69 takeover score.
#3
Iowa State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.9 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 40.8 takeover score.
#5
Stanford
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 37.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · TCU
34.5 primary output · 41.3 efficiency · 14.1 usage
48.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · TCU
48.3
34.5 primary · 41.3 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · TCU
32.6
16 primary · 28.1 efficiency · 7.3 usage
2
Impact games
14
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
92
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.