Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2014-2016Rutgers
QB • 6'3" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Hayden Rettig is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
6.4
Efficiency
59.9
Consistency
54
Season Value
55.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hayden Rettig, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers. Hayden Rettig is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Hayden Rettig played QB for Rutgers. Across 3 tracked seasons, Hayden Rettig recorded 233 passing yards, -1 rushing yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Rutgers.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 232 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with 72 yards of offense and 76.2 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
58
Efficiency
59.9
Usage
6.4
Consistency
54
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Norfolk State: 127. Ohio State: 72. Wisconsin: 39. Michigan: -6
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Norfolk State: 13 by 87.5. Ohio State: 7 by 76.2. Wisconsin: 8 by 51. Michigan: 4 by 25
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Norfolk State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 232 | 59.9 | 6.4 | 232 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -232 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with 72 yards of offense and 76.2 efficiency.
72
Primary metric
72 total offense with 76.2 efficiency.
#2
Norfolk State
127
Primary metric
Win with 127 yards of offense and 87.5 efficiency.
127 total offense with 87.5 efficiency.
#3
Wisconsin
39
Primary metric
Loss with 39 yards of offense and 51 efficiency.
39 total offense with 51 efficiency.
#4
Michigan
-6
Primary metric
Loss with -6 yards of offense and 25 efficiency.
-6 total offense with 25 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
232 primary output · 59.9 efficiency · 6.4 usage
55.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
2
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
232
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.