Usage Score
23.6
Player Dossier
2013-2015Middle Tennessee
WR • 6'0" • Fresno, TX, USA
Ed'Marques Batties reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23.6
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
69
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ed'Marques Batties, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Ed'Marques Batties reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ed'Marques Batties played WR for Middle Tennessee. Across 3 tracked seasons, Ed'Marques Batties recorded 28 rushing yards, 1,522 receiving yards, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 1,048 primary output with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
80.6
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
23.6
Consistency
69
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 88. Jackson State: 123. Alabama: 28. Charlotte: 120. Illinois: 175. Vanderbilt: 82. Western Kentucky: 44. Florida International: 7. Louisiana Tech: 111. Marshall: 88. Florida Atlantic: 36. North Texas: 64. UTSA: 82
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Jackson State: 8 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 46.7. Charlotte: 5 by 100. Illinois: 13 by 89.7. Vanderbilt: 10 by 54.7. Western Kentucky: 9 by 32.6. Florida International: 2 by 23.3. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 82.2. Marshall: 4 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 80. North Texas: 4 by 100. UTSA: 6 by 91.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/24 | @ Western Michigan | L 31-45 | — | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ UTSA | W 42-7 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs North Texas | W 41-7 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 24-17 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Marshall | W 27-24 | — | 4 | 88 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 16-45 | — | 9 | 111 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 33 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Florida International | W 42-34 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Western KentuckyHigh volume | L 28-58 | — | 9 | 44 | 4.9 | 4.90 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs VanderbiltHigh volume | L 13-17 | — | 10 | 82 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | L 25-27 | — | 13 | 175 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 2 | 42 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Charlotte100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 73-14 | — | 5 | 120 | 24 | 24 | 3 | 59 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Alabama | L 10-37 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Jackson State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 70-14 | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 2 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 474 | 67.7 | 23.6 | 474 |
| 2015 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 1,048 | 76.9 | 23.6 | 574 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 1,048 | 76.9 | 23.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
175
Primary metric
175 receiving yards with a 89.7 efficiency score.
#2
Florida International
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#3
Jackson State
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 83.8 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
1,048 primary output · 76.9 efficiency · 23.6 usage
67.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
67.4
1,048 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 23.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
49.2
474 primary · 67.7 efficiency · 23.6 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,522
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.