Usage Score
13.5
Player Dossier
2013-2017Michigan
QB • 6'4" • 211 lbs • Huntingdon, PA, USA
John O'Korn is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
13.5
Efficiency
54.5
Consistency
40.3
Season Value
34.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John O'Korn, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Houston. John O'Korn is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
John O'Korn played QB for Houston and Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, John O'Korn recorded 5,214 passing yards, 98 rushing yards, and 40 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Houston paired 3,221 primary output with 58.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Houston, Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with 270 yards of offense and 60.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
102.1
Efficiency
54.5
Usage
13.5
Consistency
40.3
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 17. Florida: 32. Purdue: 270. Michigan State: 189. Indiana: 66. Penn State: 163. Rutgers: 1. Wisconsin: 21. Ohio State: 160
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 1 by 100. Florida: 3 by 75. Purdue: 31 by 60.1. Michigan State: 43 by 39.6. Indiana: 22 by 53.5. Penn State: 42 by 51.6. Rutgers: 8 by 25.3. Wisconsin: 11 by 37.9. Ohio State: 40 by 47.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | @ South Carolina | L 19-26 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Ohio State | L 20-31 | 17 | 32 | 195 | 53.1 | 1 | 1 | 47.9 | 8 | -35 | -4.40 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-24 | 2 | 8 | 19 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 37.9 | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Rutgers | W 35-14 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 25.3 | 2 | -12 | -6 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Penn State | L 13-42 | 16 | 28 | 166 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 51.6 | 14 | -3 | -0.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Indiana | W 27-20 | 10 | 20 | 58 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 53.5 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Michigan State | L 10-14 | 16 | 35 | 198 | 45.7 | 0 | 3 | 39.6 | 8 | -9 | -1.10 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Purdue | W 28-10 | 18 | 26 | 270 | 69.2 | 1 | 1 | 60.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Florida | W 33-17 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 2 | -5 | -2.50 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2013-2014
Opening stop
Michigan
2015-2017
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Houston | 3,221 | 58.3 | 19.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 3,221 | 58.3 | 19.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 968 | 53.4 | 25.1 | -2,253 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | -968 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 204 | 57.8 | 4.9 | 204 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 919 | 54.5 | 13.5 | 715 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 919 | 54.5 | 13.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Loss with 310 yards of offense and 53 efficiency.
310
Primary metric
310 total offense with 53 efficiency.
#2
UTSA
343
Primary metric
Win with 343 yards of offense and 79.1 efficiency.
343 total offense with 79.1 efficiency.
#3
BYU
340
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
340 total offense with 51.3 efficiency.
#4
UCF
287
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
287 total offense with 54.9 efficiency.
#5
Rutgers
335
Primary metric
Win with 335 yards of offense and 70 efficiency.
335 total offense with 70 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · Houston
3,221 primary output · 58.3 efficiency · 19.1 usage
65
#2
2013 Regular Season · Houston
65
3,221 primary · 58.3 efficiency · 19.1 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Houston
44.5
968 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 25.1 usage
7
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
8
3+ TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
5,312
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.