Usage Score
36
Player Dossier
2013-2015Houston
Demarcus Ayers
WR • 5'10" • Lancaster, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Demarcus Ayers reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.3
Consistency
75.8
Season Value
71.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Houston
131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Demarcus Ayers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Houston. Demarcus Ayers reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Houston paired 1,222 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Houston
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
87.3
Efficiency
80.3
Usage
36
Consistency
75.8
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 82. Unknown: 121. Louisville: 53. Texas State: 126. Tulsa: 78. SMU: 91. Tulane: 93. UCF: 92. Vanderbilt: 59. Cincinnati: 56. Memphis: 127. UConn: 83. Navy: 161. Temple: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 9 by 60.7. Unknown: 10 by 80.7. Louisville: 8 by 44.2. Texas State: 8 by 100. Tulsa: 7 by 74.3. SMU: 7 by 86.7. Tulane: 6 by 100. UCF: 5 by 100. Vanderbilt: 5 by 78.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 74.7. Memphis: 13 by 65.1. UConn: 7 by 79. Navy: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins84.8 · n=12
First Half92 · n=7 · +9.4 vs Second Half
Second Half82.6 · n=7 · -9.4 vs First Half
All Games87.3 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | @ Florida StateHigh volume | W 38-24 | — | 9 | 82 | 6.6 | 9.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs Temple | W 24-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-31 | — | 8 | 161 | 16.7 | 20.10 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ UConn | L 17-20 | — | 7 | 83 | 9.4 | 11.90 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-34 | — | 13 | 127 | 9.2 | 9.80 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 33-30 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Vanderbilt | W 34-0 | — | 5 | 59 | 7.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ UCF | W 59-10 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 1 | 67 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Tulane | W 42-7 | — | 6 | 93 | 13.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Fri 10/9 | vs SMU | W 49-28 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Tulsa | W 38-24 | — | 7 | 78 | 10.5 | 11.10 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Texas State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 59-14 | — | 8 | 126 | 19.9 | 15.80 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ LouisvilleHigh volume | W 34-31 | — | 8 | 53 | 4.7 | 6.60 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 10 | 121 | 11.8 | 12.10 | 0 | 39 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Houston | 130 | 65.4 | 6.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 130 | 65.4 | 6.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Houston | 335 | 67.3 | 17.5 | 205 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 335 | 67.3 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Houston | 1,222 | 80.3 | 36 | 887 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 1,222 | 80.3 | 36 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
161
Primary metric
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas State
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 85.7 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Houston
1,222 primary output · 80.3 efficiency · 36 usage
71.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Houston
71.4
1,222 primary · 80.3 efficiency · 36 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Houston
36
335 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 17.5 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8525
Lancaster · Lancaster, TX
- Committed To
- Houston
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,687
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.