Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2013-2016SMU
JaBryce Taylor
WR • 6'2" • Lufkin, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
JaBryce Taylor reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.6
Consistency
47.1
Season Value
41.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTSA
13151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- SMU • UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
JaBryce Taylor, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTSA. JaBryce Taylor reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTSA paired 472 primary output with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across SMU, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · UTSA
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
17.3
Efficiency
65.6
Usage
11
Consistency
47.1
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 20. Unknown: 13. Colorado State: 11. Arizona State: 20. Old Dominion: 12. Southern Miss: 4. Rice: 14. UTEP: 31. North Texas: 0. Middle Tennessee: 14. Louisiana Tech: 8. Charlotte: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 2 by 43.3. Colorado State: 1 by 73.3. Arizona State: 2 by 66.7. Old Dominion: 1 by 80. Southern Miss: 1 by 26.7. Rice: 1 by 93.3. UTEP: 4 by 51.7. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 93.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 26.7. Charlotte: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins18.4 · n=5 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses17 · n=6 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half13.3 · n=6 · -7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half21.2 · n=6 · +7.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs New Mexico | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Charlotte | W 33-14 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 35-63 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-25 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Texas | W 31-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UTEP | L 49-52 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Rice | W 14-13 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Southern Miss | W 55-32 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Old Dominion | L 19-33 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Arizona State | L 28-32 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado State | L 14-23 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2013
Opening stop
- 2
UTSA
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
2013201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 127 | 77.5 | 8.3 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 472 | 82.9 | 13.8 | 345 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 207 | 65.6 | 11 | -265 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 207 | 65.6 | 11 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60
Primary metric
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 81 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
472 primary output · 82.9 efficiency · 13.8 usage
60.4
#2
2016 Postseason · UTSA
41.8
207 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
41.8
207 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8122
Gray Academy · Columbia, SC
- Committed To
- Coastal Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
806
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.