Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2013-2016UTSA
WR • 6'2" • Lufkin, TX, USA
JaBryce Taylor reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11
Efficiency
65.6
Consistency
47.1
Season Value
41.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
JaBryce Taylor, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTSA. JaBryce Taylor reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
JaBryce Taylor played WR for SMU and UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, JaBryce Taylor recorded 72 rushing yards, 806 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTSA paired 472 primary output with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across SMU, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
17.3
Efficiency
65.6
Usage
11
Consistency
47.1
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 20. Unknown: 13. Colorado State: 11. Arizona State: 20. Old Dominion: 12. Southern Miss: 4. Rice: 14. UTEP: 31. North Texas: 0. Middle Tennessee: 14. Louisiana Tech: 8. Charlotte: 60
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 2 by 43.3. Colorado State: 1 by 73.3. Arizona State: 2 by 66.7. Old Dominion: 1 by 80. Southern Miss: 1 by 26.7. Rice: 1 by 93.3. UTEP: 4 by 51.7. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 93.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 26.7. Charlotte: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs New Mexico | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Charlotte | W 33-14 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 35-63 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-25 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Texas | W 31-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UTEP | L 49-52 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Rice | W 14-13 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Southern Miss | W 55-32 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Old Dominion | L 19-33 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Arizona State | L 28-32 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado State | L 14-23 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2013
Opening stop
UTSA
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 127 | 77.5 | 8.3 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 472 | 82.9 | 13.8 | 345 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 207 | 65.6 | 11 | -265 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 207 | 65.6 | 11 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60
Primary metric
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 81 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
472 primary output · 82.9 efficiency · 13.8 usage
60.4
#2
2016 Postseason · UTSA
41.8
207 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
41.8
207 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 11 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8122
Gray Academy · Columbia, SC
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
806
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.