Player Stats

Dare Ogunbowale College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,025
Rushing yards
1,518
Receiving yards
507
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonWisconsin00000-
2013 Regular SeasonWisconsin00000-
2014 PostseasonWisconsin7000029.5
2014 Regular SeasonWisconsin71931930129.5
2015 PostseasonWisconsin13715021075.4
2015 Regular SeasonWisconsin131,047769278875.4
2016 PostseasonWisconsin14502228155.7
2016 Regular SeasonWisconsin14664484180555.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 1,118 primary output with 44.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 52.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska

Win with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Wisconsin

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

51

Efficiency

52.6

Usage

13.6

Consistency

67.5

Best Game by takeover score

Nebraska

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 50. LSU: 45. Akron: 18. Georgia State: 77. Michigan State: 55. Michigan: 26. Ohio State: 23. Iowa: 61. Nebraska: 119. Northwestern: 10. Illinois: 103. Purdue: 60. Minnesota: 13. Penn State: 54

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 7 by 57.3. LSU: 10 by 49.3. Akron: 4 by 46.9. Georgia State: 22 by 34.9. Michigan State: 9 by 63.7. Michigan: 5 by 31. Ohio State: 9 by 31.2. Iowa: 6 by 73.6. Nebraska: 12 by 91.3. Northwestern: 4 by 35.4. Illinois: 7 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 50. Minnesota: 5 by 21.8. Penn State: 10 by 49.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins55.5 · Games = 11 · +21.2 vs Losses
Losses34.3 · Games = 3 · -21.2 vs Wins