Usage Score
13.6
Player Dossier
2012-2016Wisconsin
RB • 5'11" • Milwaukee, WI, USA
Dare Ogunbowale leans balanced backfield option traits and 52.6 efficiency.
Usage Score
13.6
Efficiency
52.6
Consistency
67.5
Season Value
49.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dare Ogunbowale, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin. Dare Ogunbowale leans balanced backfield option traits and 52.6 efficiency.
Dare Ogunbowale played RB for Wisconsin. Across 5 tracked seasons, Dare Ogunbowale recorded 1,518 rushing yards, 507 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Wisconsin.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 1,118 primary output with 44.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 52.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Win with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
51
Efficiency
52.6
Usage
13.6
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 50. LSU: 45. Akron: 18. Georgia State: 77. Michigan State: 55. Michigan: 26. Ohio State: 23. Iowa: 61. Nebraska: 119. Northwestern: 10. Illinois: 103. Purdue: 60. Minnesota: 13. Penn State: 54
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 7 by 57.3. LSU: 10 by 49.3. Akron: 4 by 46.9. Georgia State: 22 by 34.9. Michigan State: 9 by 63.7. Michigan: 5 by 31. Ohio State: 9 by 31.2. Iowa: 6 by 73.6. Nebraska: 12 by 91.3. Northwestern: 4 by 35.4. Illinois: 7 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 50. Minnesota: 5 by 21.8. Penn State: 10 by 49.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-16 | 5 | 22 | 4.40 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 7.1 |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Penn State | L 31-38 | 6 | 26 | 4.30 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | 4 | 7 | 1.80 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2.6 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue | W 49-20 | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 3 | 62 | 12 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Illinois100 rush yards | W 48-3 | 7 | 103 | 14.70 | 0 | — | — | 14.7 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 2.5 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Nebraska100 rush yards | W 23-17 | 11 | 120 | 10.90 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 9.9 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa | W 17-9 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 51 | 10.2 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Ohio State | L 23-30 | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2.6 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Michigan | L 7-14 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 30-6 | 9 | 55 | 6.10 | 0 | — | — | 6.1 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Georgia State | W 23-17 | 20 | 65 | 3.30 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 3.5 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron | W 54-10 | 4 | 18 | 4.50 | 0 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs LSU | W 16-14 | 9 | 44 | 4.90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 193 | 49.3 | 7.9 | 193 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 193 | 49.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,118 | 44.2 | 29.9 | 925 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,118 | 44.2 | 29.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 714 | 52.6 | 13.6 | -404 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 714 | 52.6 | 13.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Win with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
119
Primary metric
119 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#2
Minnesota
156
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
156 scrimmage yards and 48.6 usage.
#3
Illinois
103
Primary metric
Win with 103 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
103 scrimmage yards and 9.7 usage.
#4
Bowling Green
94
Primary metric
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
94 scrimmage yards and 20.9 usage.
#5
Miami (OH)
137
Primary metric
Win with 137 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
137 scrimmage yards and 27.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
1,118 primary output · 44.2 efficiency · 29.9 usage
61.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
61.5
1,118 primary · 44.2 efficiency · 29.9 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
49.4
714 primary · 52.6 efficiency · 13.6 usage
5
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,025
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.