Usage Score
3.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016Tulsa
DT • 6'3" • Houston, TX, USA
Jerry Uwaezuoke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.5
Efficiency
18.4
Consistency
5.6
Season Value
31.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerry Uwaezuoke, DT. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa. Jerry Uwaezuoke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.4 disruption score.
Jerry Uwaezuoke played DT for Tulsa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jerry Uwaezuoke recorded 47 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Tulsa paired 2.5 primary output with 18.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
18.4
Usage
3.5
Consistency
5.6
Best Game by takeover score
San José State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 0. San José State: 2. Ohio State: 0. North Carolina A&T: 0. Fresno State: 0. SMU: 0. Houston: 0. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 0. East Carolina: 0. Navy: 0. Cincinnati: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. San José State: 4 by 36.7. Ohio State: 6 by 25. North Carolina A&T: 1 by 4.2. Fresno State: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 6 by 25. Tulane: 5 by 20.8. Memphis: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Navy: 10 by 41.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 25.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
San José State
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/19 | vs Central Michigan | W 55-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Cincinnati | W 40-37 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Navy10+ tackles | L 40-42 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | vs East Carolina | W 45-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Memphis | W 59-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tulane | W 50-27 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Houston | L 31-38 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs SMU | W 43-40 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Fresno State | W 48-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs North Carolina A&T | W 58-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 3-48 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs San José StateSplash game | W 45-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 2.5 | 18.4 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2.5 | 18.4 | 3.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
San José State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#2
Cincinnati
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 19.1 takeover score.
#3
Navy
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 15.9 takeover score.
#4
Ohio State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.5 takeover score.
#5
Houston
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
2.5 primary output · 18.4 efficiency · 3.5 usage
31.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
31.9
2.5 primary · 18.4 efficiency · 3.5 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Tulsa
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
47
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.