Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
WR • 5'10" • Dallas, TX, USA
Jaquan White reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.4
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
10
Season Value
23.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaquan White, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP. Jaquan White reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jaquan White played WR for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jaquan White recorded 12 rushing yards, 648 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTEP paired 494 primary output with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
5.9
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
8.4
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 36. Texas: 4. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 10. Louisiana Tech: 0. Florida International: 9. UTSA: 0. Old Dominion: 0. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. Texas: 1 by 26.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 66.7. Florida International: 1 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs North Texas | W 52-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 24-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Old Dominion | L 21-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UTSA | W 52-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Florida International | L 21-35 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 7-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-34 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Army | L 14-66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | L 7-41 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs New Mexico State | W 38-22 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 95 | 67.8 | 10.5 | 95 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 494 | 63 | 19.1 | 399 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 59 | 63.4 | 8.4 | -435 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico State
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
494 primary output · 63 efficiency · 19.1 usage
60.8
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
30.3
95 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
23.4
59 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 8.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
648
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.