Usage Score
19.8
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTEP
WR • 5'9" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Jarrad Shaw reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.8
Efficiency
68.9
Consistency
43.4
Season Value
58
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarrad Shaw, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · UTEP. Jarrad Shaw reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jarrad Shaw played WR for UTEP. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jarrad Shaw recorded 168 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
UTEP paired 168 primary output with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
28
Efficiency
68.9
Usage
19.8
Consistency
43.4
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 4. New Mexico: 76. Texas Tech: 43. New Mexico State: 23. UTSA: 16. Southern Miss: 6
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 1 by 26.7. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Texas Tech: 3 by 95.6. New Mexico State: 3 by 51.1. UTSA: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | UTEP | 168 | 68.9 | 19.8 | 168 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 168 | 68.9 | 19.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas Tech
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 51.1 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · UTEP
168 primary output · 68.9 efficiency · 19.8 usage
58
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
58
168 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 19.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
168
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.