Usage Score
24.7
Player Dossier
2012-2014Air Force
QB • 5'9" • Tulsa, OK, USA
Kale Pearson is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
24.7
Efficiency
66.4
Consistency
85.4
Season Value
69.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Air Force
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kale Pearson, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Air Force. Kale Pearson is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Kale Pearson played QB for Air Force. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kale Pearson recorded 1,764 passing yards, 751 rushing yards, and 41 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Air Force.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Air Force paired 2,277 primary output with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
189.8
Efficiency
66.4
Usage
24.7
Consistency
85.4
Best Game by takeover score
Nevada
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 118. Nicholls: 65. Wyoming: 248. Georgia State: 229. Boise State: 175. Navy: 173. Utah State: 212. New Mexico: 225. Army: 182. UNLV: 182. Nevada: 238. San Diego State: 230
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 23 by 64. Nicholls: 14 by 58.5. Wyoming: 43 by 58. Georgia State: 24 by 71.4. Boise State: 31 by 61.3. Navy: 29 by 68.5. Utah State: 38 by 56.9. New Mexico: 29 by 72.1. Army: 23 by 67.1. UNLV: 21 by 82. Nevada: 31 by 78.3. San Diego State: 36 by 58.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
82 vs UNLV
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Western Michigan | W 38-24 | 5 | 9 | 77 | 55.6 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 14 | 41 | 2.90 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ San Diego StateDual-threat | L 14-30 | 10 | 22 | 171 | 45.5 | 1 | 1 | 58.5 | 14 | 59 | 4.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Nevada3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 45-38 | 11 | 15 | 129 | 73.3 | 3 | 0 | 78.3 | 16 | 109 | 6.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ UNLVDual-threat | W 48-21 | 5 | 6 | 115 | 83.3 | 1 | 0 | 82 | 15 | 67 | 4.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Army | W 23-6 | 8 | 12 | 141 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 67.1 | 11 | 41 | 3.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs New MexicoDual-threat | W 35-31 | 5 | 9 | 159 | 55.6 | 1 | 0 | 72.1 | 20 | 66 | 3.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Utah State | L 16-34 | 9 | 18 | 169 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 56.9 | 20 | 43 | 2.20 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Navy3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 30-21 | 11 | 16 | 112 | 68.8 | 3 | 0 | 68.5 | 13 | 61 | 4.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Boise StateDual-threat | W 28-14 | 5 | 11 | 48 | 45.5 | 1 | 0 | 61.3 | 20 | 127 | 6.30 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Georgia State3+ TD | W 48-38 | 12 | 15 | 224 | 80.0 | 2 | 0 | 71.4 | 9 | 5 | 0.60 | 2 | 6 |
| Sun 9/7 | @ Wyoming | L 13-17 | 17 | 32 | 226 | 53.1 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 11 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Nicholls | W 44-16 | 3 | 6 | 19 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 58.5 | 8 | 46 | 5.80 | 0 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Air Force
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Air Force | 177 | 39.8 | 6.7 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Air Force | 177 | 39.8 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Air Force | 61 | 65.1 | 4.9 | -116 |
| 2014 Postseason | Air Force | 2,277 | 66.4 | 24.7 | 2,216 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Air Force | 2,277 | 66.4 | 24.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
238
Primary metric
238 total offense with 78.3 efficiency.
#2
New Mexico
225
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
225 total offense with 72.1 efficiency.
#3
San Diego State
230
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
230 total offense with 58.5 efficiency.
#4
Utah State
212
Primary metric
Loss with 212 yards of offense and 56.9 efficiency.
212 total offense with 56.9 efficiency.
#5
Wyoming
248
Primary metric
Loss with 248 yards of offense and 58 efficiency.
248 total offense with 58 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · Air Force
2,277 primary output · 66.4 efficiency · 24.7 usage
69.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · Air Force
69.1
2,277 primary · 66.4 efficiency · 24.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Air Force
43.2
61 primary · 65.1 efficiency · 4.9 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
10
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,515
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.