Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2012-2013Arkansas
D'Arthur Cowan
WR • 6'3" • Olive Branch, MS, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
D'Arthur Cowan reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
43.3
Consistency
77.9
Season Value
56.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Arkansas
1213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Arkansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D'Arthur Cowan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Arkansas. D'Arthur Cowan reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 26 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Arkansas
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
6.5
Efficiency
43.3
Usage
7.4
Consistency
77.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 9. Auburn: 8. Mississippi State: 2. LSU: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 1 by 60. Auburn: 1 by 53.3. Mississippi State: 1 by 13.3. LSU: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Losses6.5 · n=4
First Half8.5 · n=2 · +4 vs Second Half
Second Half4.5 · n=2 · -4 vs First Half
All Games6.5 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
60 vs Florida
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Arkansas | 14 | 38.4 | 6.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas | 26 | 43.3 | 7.4 | 12 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9
Primary metric
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
5
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 16.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Arkansas
26 primary output · 43.3 efficiency · 7.4 usage
56.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Arkansas
34.4
14 primary · 38.4 efficiency · 6.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8831
Olive Branch · Olive Branch, MS
- Committed To
- Arkansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
40
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.