Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2012-2013Arkansas
WR • 6'3" • Olive Branch, MS, USA
D'Arthur Cowan reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.4
Efficiency
43.3
Consistency
77.9
Season Value
56.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Arkansas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D'Arthur Cowan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Arkansas. D'Arthur Cowan reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
D'Arthur Cowan played WR for Arkansas. Across 2 tracked seasons, D'Arthur Cowan recorded 40 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Arkansas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 26 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
6.5
Efficiency
43.3
Usage
7.4
Consistency
77.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 9. Auburn: 8. Mississippi State: 2. LSU: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 1 by 60. Auburn: 1 by 53.3. Mississippi State: 1 by 13.3. LSU: 1 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
60 vs Florida
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Arkansas | 14 | 38.4 | 6.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas | 26 | 43.3 | 7.4 | 12 |
#1 Featured game
Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9
Primary metric
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
5
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 16.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Arkansas
26 primary output · 43.3 efficiency · 7.4 usage
56.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Arkansas
34.4
14 primary · 38.4 efficiency · 6.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8831
Olive Branch · Olive Branch, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
40
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.