Usage Score
22.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Cincinnati
Nate Cole
WR • 6'1" • Memphis, TN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Nate Cole reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
53.6
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Cole, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Nate Cole reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 518 primary output with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
43.2
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
22.4
Consistency
53.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 64. Purdue: 81. Houston: 60. Miami (OH): 10. South Florida: 73. UConn: 76. East Carolina: 28. Temple: 32. BYU: 15. UCF: 25. Memphis: 34. Tulsa: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 71.1. Purdue: 6 by 90. Houston: 9 by 44.4. Miami (OH): 2 by 33.3. South Florida: 7 by 69.5. UConn: 5 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 62.2. Temple: 5 by 42.7. BYU: 1 by 100. UCF: 2 by 83.3. Memphis: 6 by 37.8. Tulsa: 5 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins39.7 · n=3 · -2.2 vs Losses
Losses41.9 · n=8 · +2.2 vs Wins
First Half60.7 · n=6 · +35 vs Second Half
Second Half25.7 · n=6 · -35 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Tulsa | L 37-40 | — | 5 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Memphis | L 7-34 | — | 6 | 34 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ UCF | L 3-24 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs BYU | L 3-20 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Temple | L 13-34 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs East Carolina | W 31-19 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UConn | L 9-20 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs South Florida | L 20-45 | — | 7 | 73 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Miami (OH) | W 27-20 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Thu 9/15 | vs HoustonHigh volume | L 16-40 | — | 9 | 60 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Purdue2+ TD | W 38-20 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 2 | 28 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 39 | 50 | 4.2 | 39 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 145 | 55.8 | 6.5 | 106 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 262 | 76.2 | 6.6 | 117 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 518 | 63.4 | 22.4 | 256 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
518 primary output · 63.4 efficiency · 22.4 usage
59.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati
44.5
262 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 6.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Cincinnati
34.5
145 primary · 55.8 efficiency · 6.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8594
Mitchell · Memphis, TN
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
964
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.