Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2012-2015Penn State
Brent Wilkerson
TE • 6'3" • Clinton, MD, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Brent Wilkerson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
47.4
Consistency
81.3
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Penn State
12131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brent Wilkerson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Penn State. Brent Wilkerson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Penn State paired 39 primary output with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Penn State
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
13
Efficiency
47.4
Usage
15.6
Consistency
81.3
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 14. Michigan: 16. Michigan State: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 2 by 46.7. Michigan: 3 by 35.6. Michigan State: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Losses12.5 · n=2
First Half15 · n=2
All Games13 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
60 vs Michigan State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 18 | 60 | 11.1 | 18 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 39 | 47.4 | 15.6 | 21 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18
Primary metric
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 35.6 efficiency score.
#3
Army
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Penn State
39 primary output · 47.4 efficiency · 15.6 usage
60.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Penn State
54
18 primary · 60 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Penn State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8913
DeMatha Catholic · Hyattsville, MD
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
57
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.