Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2012-2015Penn State
TE • 6'3" • Clinton, MD, USA
Brent Wilkerson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.6
Efficiency
47.4
Consistency
81.3
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brent Wilkerson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Penn State. Brent Wilkerson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Brent Wilkerson played TE for Penn State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Brent Wilkerson recorded 57 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Penn State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Penn State paired 39 primary output with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
13
Efficiency
47.4
Usage
15.6
Consistency
81.3
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 14. Michigan: 16. Michigan State: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 2 by 46.7. Michigan: 3 by 35.6. Michigan State: 1 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
60 vs Michigan State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 18 | 60 | 11.1 | 18 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 39 | 47.4 | 15.6 | 21 |
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18
Primary metric
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 35.6 efficiency score.
#3
Army
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Penn State
39 primary output · 47.4 efficiency · 15.6 usage
60.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Penn State
54
18 primary · 60 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Penn State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8913
DeMatha Catholic · Hyattsville, MD
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
57
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.