Usage Score
22.3
Player Dossier
2012-2015Memphis
Mose Frazier
WR • 5'11" • Memphis, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mose Frazier reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.7
Consistency
71.3
Season Value
67.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Memphis
121314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mose Frazier, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Memphis. Mose Frazier reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mose Frazier played WR for Memphis. Across 4 tracked seasons, Mose Frazier recorded 203 rushing yards, 1,599 receiving yards, and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Memphis.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Memphis paired 797 primary output with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Memphis
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
61.3
Efficiency
74.7
Usage
22.3
Consistency
71.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 47. Missouri State: 89. Kansas: 77. Bowling Green: 66. Cincinnati: 16. South Florida: 31. Ole Miss: 83. Tulsa: 128. Tulane: 75. Navy: 61. Houston: 33. Temple: 35. SMU: 56
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 4 by 78.3. Missouri State: 6 by 98.9. Kansas: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 7 by 62.9. Cincinnati: 2 by 53.3. South Florida: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 8 by 69.2. Tulsa: 10 by 85.3. Tulane: 7 by 71.4. Navy: 6 by 67.8. Houston: 4 by 55. Temple: 8 by 29.2. SMU: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins69 · Games = 9 · +25 vs Losses
Losses44 · Games = 4 · -25 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/30 | vs Auburn | L 10-31 | — | 4 | 47 | 7.6 | 11.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs SMU | W 63-0 | — | 2 | 56 | 22.3 | 28 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ TempleHigh volume | L 12-31 | — | 8 | 35 | 4 | 4.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Houston | L 34-35 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Navy | L 20-45 | — | 6 | 61 | 9.4 | 10.20 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Tulane | W 41-13 | — | 7 | 75 | 9.2 | 10.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | W 66-42 | — | 10 | 128 | 11.1 | 12.80 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Ole MissHigh volume | W 37-24 | — | 8 | 83 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 31 |
| Fri 10/2 | @ South Florida | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 9/24 | vs Cincinnati | W 53-46 | — | 2 | 16 | 8.3 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-41 | — | 7 | 66 | 6.5 | 9.40 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Kansas | W 55-23 | — | 4 | 77 | 20.1 | 19.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Missouri State2+ TD | W 63-7 | — | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 2 | 44 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201220132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Memphis | 296 | 89.6 | 11.9 | 296 |
| 2014 Postseason | Memphis | 506 | 64.5 | 18.2 | 210 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Memphis | 506 | 64.5 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Memphis | 797 | 74.7 | 22.3 | 291 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Memphis | 797 | 74.7 | 22.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
128
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri State
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Memphis
797 primary output · 74.7 efficiency · 22.3 usage
67.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Memphis
67.1
797 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 22.3 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Memphis
52
296 primary · 89.6 efficiency · 11.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,599
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Mose Frazier
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.