Usage Score
33.1
Player Dossier
2012-2015Wisconsin
WR • 6'0" • Darlington, WI, USA
Alex Erickson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
33.1
Efficiency
80.2
Consistency
81.3
Season Value
73.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Erickson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin. Alex Erickson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Alex Erickson played WR for Wisconsin. Across 4 tracked seasons, Alex Erickson recorded 124 rushing yards, 1,877 receiving yards, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Wisconsin.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 978 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.2
Efficiency
80.2
Usage
33.1
Consistency
81.3
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 54. Alabama: 73. Miami (OH): 73. Troy: 87. Hawai'i: 87. Iowa: 30. Nebraska: 113. Purdue: 86. Illinois: 96. Rutgers: 103. Maryland: 83. Northwestern: 27. Minnesota: 66
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 5 by 72. Alabama: 6 by 81.1. Miami (OH): 5 by 97.3. Troy: 3 by 100. Hawai'i: 9 by 64.4. Iowa: 3 by 66.7. Nebraska: 7 by 100. Purdue: 9 by 63.7. Illinois: 10 by 64. Rutgers: 6 by 100. Maryland: 5 by 100. Northwestern: 3 by 60. Minnesota: 6 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | vs USC | W 23-21 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Minnesota | W 31-21 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Northwestern | L 7-13 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Maryland | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 83 | 14 | 16.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 48-10 | — | 6 | 103 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ IllinoisHigh volume | W 24-13 | — | 10 | 96 | 12.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs PurdueHigh volume | W 24-7 | — | 9 | 86 | 9 | 9.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Nebraska100 receiving yards | W 23-21 | — | 7 | 113 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Iowa | L 6-10 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Hawai'iHigh volume | W 28-0 | — | 9 | 87 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Troy | W 28-3 | — | 3 | 87 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Miami (OH) | W 58-0 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Alabama | L 17-35 | — | 6 | 73 | 14 | 12.20 | 1 | 23 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 127 | 77 | 8.9 | 127 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 127 | 77 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 772 | 69.6 | 32.3 | 645 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 772 | 69.6 | 32.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 978 | 80.2 | 33.1 | 206 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 978 | 80.2 | 33.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160
Primary metric
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
978 primary output · 80.2 efficiency · 33.1 usage
73.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
73.6
978 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 33.1 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Wisconsin
55.3
772 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 32.3 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,877
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.