Usage Score
15.8
Player Dossier
2012-2013Oklahoma
Lacoltan Bester
WR • 6'3" • Scooba, MS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Lacoltan Bester reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
29.4
Season Value
55.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Oklahoma
121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lacoltan Bester, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Oklahoma. Lacoltan Bester reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lacoltan Bester played WR for Oklahoma. Across 2 tracked seasons, Lacoltan Bester recorded 49 passing yards, 35 rushing yards, and 421 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Oklahoma.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 392 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
32.7
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
15.8
Consistency
29.4
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 105. UL Monroe: 7. West Virginia: 46. Tulsa: 16. Notre Dame: 26. TCU: 19. Texas: 70. Kansas: 0. Texas Tech: 9. Baylor: 11. Iowa State: 75. Oklahoma State: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 6 by 100. UL Monroe: 1 by 46.7. West Virginia: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 53.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. TCU: 1 by 100. Texas: 5 by 93.3. Texas Tech: 1 by 60. Baylor: 2 by 36.7. Iowa State: 4 by 100. Oklahoma State: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins31.1 · Games = 10 · -9.4 vs Losses
Losses40.5 · Games = 2 · +9.4 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/3 | @ Alabama100 receiving yards | W 45-31 | — | 6 | 105 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Oklahoma State | W 33-24 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Iowa State | W 48-10 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 44 |
| Fri 11/8 | @ Baylor | L 12-41 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Texas Tech | W 38-30 | — | 1 | 9 | 22 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Kansas | W 34-19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Texas | L 20-36 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs TCU | W 20-17 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Notre Dame | W 35-21 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Tulsa | W 51-20 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs West Virginia | W 16-7 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs UL Monroe | W 34-0 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 29 | 64.5 | 4.3 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Oklahoma | 392 | 76.7 | 15.8 | 363 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 392 | 76.7 | 15.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa State
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Texas
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
West Virginia
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · Oklahoma
392 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 15.8 usage
55.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · Oklahoma
55.5
392 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Oklahoma
38.8
29 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
421
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Lacoltan Bester
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.