Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Toledo
Corey Jones
WR • 5'9" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Corey Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.2
Consistency
71.9
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Toledo
13141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Toledo. Corey Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Toledo paired 851 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.8
Efficiency
75.2
Usage
23.1
Consistency
71.9
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 72. Arkansas State: 54. Unknown: 100. Fresno State: 30. BYU: 56. Eastern Michigan: 33. Bowling Green: 90. Central Michigan: 85. Ohio: 115. Akron: 30. Northern Illinois: 38. Ball State: 63. Western Michigan: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 6 by 80. Arkansas State: 6 by 60. Unknown: 3 by 100. Fresno State: 4 by 50. BYU: 6 by 62.2. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 31.4. Bowling Green: 5 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 81. Ohio: 7 by 100. Akron: 4 by 50. Northern Illinois: 4 by 63.3. Ball State: 4 by 100. Western Michigan: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins52.9 · n=8 · -20.6 vs Losses
Losses73.5 · n=4 · +20.6 vs Wins
First Half62.1 · n=7 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half63.7 · n=6 · +1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs App State | L 28-31 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 58 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan | L 35-55 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 46 |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Ball State | W 37-19 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 36 |
| Thu 11/10 | @ Northern Illinois | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Wed 11/2 | @ Akron | W 48-17 | — | 4 | 30 | 6.6 | 7.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards | L 26-31 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-17 | — | 7 | 85 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Bowling Green | W 42-35 | — | 5 | 90 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 35-20 | — | 7 | 33 | 4.5 | 4.70 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ BYU | L 53-55 | — | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Fresno State | W 52-17 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 3 | 100 | 33.3 | 33.30 | 1 | 85 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas State | W 31-10 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Toledo | 851 | 75.8 | 28.3 | 851 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 851 | 75.8 | 28.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 577 | 68.1 | 24.3 | -274 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 577 | 68.1 | 24.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 817 | 75.2 | 23.1 | 240 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 817 | 75.2 | 23.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa State
118
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 65.6 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 85.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Toledo
851 primary output · 75.8 efficiency · 28.3 usage
66.3
#2
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
66.3
851 primary · 75.8 efficiency · 28.3 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Toledo
64.9
817 primary · 75.2 efficiency · 23.1 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.893
Penn Hills · Pittsburgh, PA
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,245
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.