Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Toledo
WR • 5'9" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Corey Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23.1
Efficiency
75.2
Consistency
71.9
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Toledo. Corey Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Corey Jones played WR for Toledo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Corey Jones recorded 125 rushing yards, 2,245 receiving yards, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Toledo paired 851 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.8
Efficiency
75.2
Usage
23.1
Consistency
71.9
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 72. Arkansas State: 54. Unknown: 100. Fresno State: 30. BYU: 56. Eastern Michigan: 33. Bowling Green: 90. Central Michigan: 85. Ohio: 115. Akron: 30. Northern Illinois: 38. Ball State: 63. Western Michigan: 51
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 6 by 80. Arkansas State: 6 by 60. Unknown: 3 by 100. Fresno State: 4 by 50. BYU: 6 by 62.2. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 31.4. Bowling Green: 5 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 81. Ohio: 7 by 100. Akron: 4 by 50. Northern Illinois: 4 by 63.3. Ball State: 4 by 100. Western Michigan: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs App State | L 28-31 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 58 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan | L 35-55 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 46 |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Ball State | W 37-19 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 36 |
| Thu 11/10 | @ Northern Illinois | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Wed 11/2 | @ Akron | W 48-17 | — | 4 | 30 | 6.6 | 7.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards | L 26-31 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-17 | — | 7 | 85 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Bowling Green | W 42-35 | — | 5 | 90 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 35-20 | — | 7 | 33 | 4.5 | 4.70 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ BYU | L 53-55 | — | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Fresno State | W 52-17 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 3 | 100 | 33.3 | 33.30 | 1 | 85 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas State | W 31-10 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Toledo | 851 | 75.8 | 28.3 | 851 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 851 | 75.8 | 28.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 577 | 68.1 | 24.3 | -274 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 577 | 68.1 | 24.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 817 | 75.2 | 23.1 | 240 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 817 | 75.2 | 23.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa State
118
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 65.6 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 85.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Toledo
851 primary output · 75.8 efficiency · 28.3 usage
66.3
#2
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
66.3
851 primary · 75.8 efficiency · 28.3 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Toledo
64.9
817 primary · 75.2 efficiency · 23.1 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.893
Penn Hills · Pittsburgh, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,245
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.