Player Stats

Greg Windham College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
2,804
Passing yards
2,262
Rushing yards
542
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonOhio00000-
2013 Regular SeasonOhio00000-
2014 Regular SeasonOhio41028220029.5
2015 PostseasonOhio935332033.6
2015 Regular SeasonOhio9379265114133.6
2016 PostseasonOhio1033931524272
2016 Regular SeasonOhio101,9491,5673821572

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Ohio paired 2,288 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 60.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Ohio

Games

10

Primary Metric / G

228.8

Efficiency

60.5

Usage

23.8

Consistency

74.7

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 339. Texas State: 417. Kansas: 313. Tennessee: 269. Gardner-Webb: 199. Miami (OH): 87. Bowling Green: 233. Eastern Michigan: 101. Toledo: 102. Western Michigan: 228

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 57 by 48.7. Texas State: 53 by 69.2. Kansas: 52 by 67.9. Tennessee: 55 by 58.8. Gardner-Webb: 34 by 66. Miami (OH): 37 by 39.7. Bowling Green: 36 by 66.4. Eastern Michigan: 24 by 50.9. Toledo: 10 by 77.9. Western Michigan: 33 by 59.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins186.8 · Games = 5 · -84 vs Losses
Losses270.8 · Games = 5 · +84 vs Wins