Player Dossier

2012-2016

Ohio

Greg Windham

QB • 6'1" • Tampa, FL, USA

Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator

Greg Windham is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.8 usage in the latest tracked season.

Usage Score

23.8

Efficiency

60.5

Consistency

74.7

Season Value

64.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio

12131415151616

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Ohio
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Greg Windham, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio. Greg Windham is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.8 usage in the latest tracked season.

Greg Windham played QB for Ohio. Across 5 tracked seasons, Greg Windham recorded 2,262 passing yards, 542 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Ohio.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Ohio paired 2,288 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 60.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas State

Loss with 417 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Ohio

Games

10

Primary Metric / G

228.8

Efficiency

60.5

Usage

23.8

Consistency

74.7

Best Game by takeover score

Troy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 339. Texas State: 417. Kansas: 313. Tennessee: 269. Unknown: 199. Miami (OH): 87. Bowling Green: 233. Eastern Michigan: 101. Toledo: 102. Western Michigan: 228

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 57 by 48.7. Texas State: 53 by 69.2. Kansas: 52 by 67.9. Tennessee: 55 by 58.8. Unknown: 34 by 66. Miami (OH): 37 by 39.7. Bowling Green: 36 by 66.4. Eastern Michigan: 24 by 50.9. Toledo: 10 by 77.9. Western Michigan: 33 by 59.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins183.8 · Games = 4 · -87.1 vs Losses
Losses270.8 · Games = 5 · +87.1 vs Wins
First Half307.4 · Games = 5 · +157.2 vs Second Half
Second Half150.2 · Games = 5 · -157.2 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

10 games

Featured metric

Total Offense

Top game by takeover score

Texas State

Best efficiency game

77.9 vs Toledo

Result
Sat 12/24@ Troy300-yard gameL 23-28234731548.92448.710242.4009
Sat 12/3vs Western Michigan3+ TDL 23-29143021446.73159.93144.70011
Thu 10/27@ ToledoW 31-26468466.71077.94184.50024
Sat 10/15vs Eastern MichiganL 20-2791710352.90050.97-2-0.3009
Sat 10/8vs Bowling GreenW 30-24202719074.11166.49434.80112
Sat 10/1@ Miami (OH)W 17-77185638.90139.719311.60114
Sat 9/24vs UnknownDual-threat142414358.3106610565.60011
Sat 9/17@ TennesseeL 19-28234623050.01058.89394.3007
Sat 9/10@ KansasDual-threatW 37-21193616752.81167.9161469.10153
Sat 9/3vs Texas State300-yard game · 3+ TDL 54-56274538060.04069.28374.60011

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Ohio

    2012-2016

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2012201320142015201520162016
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2012 Regular SeasonOhio0
2013 Regular SeasonOhio00
2014 Regular SeasonOhio10256.15.4102
2015 PostseasonOhio41450.410.2312
2015 Regular SeasonOhio41450.410.20
2016 PostseasonOhio2,28860.523.81,874
2016 Regular SeasonOhio2,28860.523.80

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Western Michigan

Loss with 120 yards of offense and 80 efficiency.

120

Primary metric

120 total offense with 80 efficiency.

#2

Texas State

417

Primary metric

Loss with 417 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency.

417 total offense with 69.2 efficiency.

#3

Northern Illinois

119

Primary metric

Win with 119 yards of offense and 50 efficiency.

119 total offense with 50 efficiency.

#4

Kansas

313

Primary metric

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

313 total offense with 67.9 efficiency.

#5

Bowling Green

60

Primary metric

Loss with 60 yards of offense and 62.8 efficiency.

60 total offense with 62.8 efficiency.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2016 Postseason · Ohio

2,288 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 23.8 usage

64.8

#2

2016 Regular Season · Ohio

64.8

2,288 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 23.8 usage

#3

2015 Postseason · Ohio

31.2

414 primary · 50.4 efficiency · 10.2 usage

Milestones

4

250+ passing yards

3

300+ total offense

0

3+ takeover TD games

11

Above avg efficiency

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2012 · Rating 0.8094

King · Tampa, FL

Committed To
Ohio
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2012

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

2,804

Career Total Offense

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.