Usage Score
36.2
Player Dossier
2012-2015Texas A&M
RB • 6'0" • Texarkana, TX, USA
Tra Carson leans workhorse runner traits and 50.9 efficiency.
Usage Score
36.2
Efficiency
50.9
Consistency
79
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tra Carson, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Texas A&M. Tra Carson leans workhorse runner traits and 50.9 efficiency.
Tra Carson played RB for Texas A&M. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tra Carson recorded 28 passing yards, 2,075 rushing yards, and 299 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 1,348 primary output with 50.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
103.7
Efficiency
50.9
Usage
36.2
Consistency
79
Best Game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 113. Arizona State: 105. Ball State: 59. Nevada: 154. Arkansas: 89. Mississippi State: 123. Alabama: 62. Ole Miss: 57. South Carolina: 140. Auburn: 109. Western Carolina: 109. Vanderbilt: 157. LSU: 71
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 21 by 55.5. Arizona State: 30 by 35.3. Ball State: 10 by 61.5. Nevada: 23 by 66.8. Arkansas: 16 by 45.1. Mississippi State: 27 by 45.4. Alabama: 18 by 36.5. Ole Miss: 21 by 32.7. South Carolina: 23 by 61.7. Auburn: 21 by 54.1. Western Carolina: 17 by 66.8. Vanderbilt: 24 by 63.1. LSU: 20 by 37.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
66.8 vs Western Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | @ Louisville100 rush yards | L 21-27 | 20 | 106 | 5.30 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5.4 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ LSU | L 7-19 | 19 | 69 | 3.60 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.5 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ Vanderbilt100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 25-0 | 22 | 126 | 5.70 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 6.5 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Western Carolina100 rush yards | W 41-17 | 17 | 109 | 6.40 | 1 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Auburn100 rush yards | L 10-26 | 21 | 109 | 5.20 | 0 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs South Carolina100 rush yards | W 35-28 | 21 | 122 | 5.80 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 6.1 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Ole Miss | L 3-23 | 14 | 48 | 3.40 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 2.7 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Alabama | L 23-41 | 13 | 46 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards | W 30-17 | 26 | 110 | 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4.6 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Arkansas | W 28-21 | 8 | 28 | 3.50 | 1 | 8 | 61 | 5.6 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Nevada100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 44-27 | 22 | 137 | 6.20 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 6.7 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Ball State | W 56-23 | 10 | 59 | 5.90 | 1 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Arizona State2+ TD | W 38-17 | 29 | 96 | 3.30 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas A&M | 367 | 52.2 | 9.4 | 367 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 367 | 52.2 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Texas A&M | 659 | 47.9 | 19.8 | 292 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 659 | 47.9 | 19.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,348 | 50.9 | 36.2 | 689 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,348 | 50.9 | 36.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
157
Primary metric
157 scrimmage yards and 42.9 usage.
#2
Nevada
154
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
154 scrimmage yards and 38.3 usage.
#3
West Virginia
153
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
153 scrimmage yards and 37.7 usage.
#4
South Carolina
140
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
140 scrimmage yards and 31.9 usage.
#5
Rice
76
Primary metric
Win with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 23.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Texas A&M
1,348 primary output · 50.9 efficiency · 36.2 usage
66.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
66.5
1,348 primary · 50.9 efficiency · 36.2 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Texas A&M
44.9
659 primary · 47.9 efficiency · 19.8 usage
8
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8813
Liberty-Eylau · Texarkana, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,374
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.