Usage Score
13.4
Player Profile
QB • 6'2" • Fruit Cove, FL, USA
Nathan Peterman is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
13.4
Efficiency
65.9
Consistency
77.9
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Quick Facts
Nathan Peterman, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Nathan Peterman is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 3,141 primary output with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
241.6
Efficiency
65.9
Usage
13.4
Consistency
77.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 248. Unknown: 167. Penn State: 143. Oklahoma State: 270. North Carolina: 159. Marshall: 298. Georgia Tech: 185. Virginia: 163. Virginia Tech: 300. Miami: 312. Clemson: 326. Duke: 240. Syracuse: 330
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 21 by 62.5. Unknown: 35 by 51.2. Penn State: 23 by 65.6. Oklahoma State: 38 by 59.8. North Carolina: 24 by 68.6. Marshall: 28 by 77.5. Georgia Tech: 24 by 62.5. Virginia: 26 by 64.7. Virginia Tech: 27 by 76.7. Miami: 43 by 59.2. Clemson: 43 by 64.7. Duke: 22 by 61.6. Syracuse: 24 by 81.9
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
81.9 vs Syracuse
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Northwestern | L 24-31 | 13 | 18 | 253 | 72.2 | 1 | 1 | 62.5 | 3 | -5 | -1.70 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Syracuse3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 76-61 | 9 | 18 | 251 | 50.0 | 4 | 1 | 81.9 | 6 | 79 | 13.20 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Duke3+ TD | W 56-14 | 11 | 18 | 237 | 61.1 | 3 | 1 | 61.6 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Clemson300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 43-42 | 22 | 37 | 308 | 59.5 | 5 | 0 | 64.7 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Miami | L 28-51 | 17 | 35 | 287 | 48.6 | 2 | 1 | 59.2 | 8 | 25 | 3.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Virginia Tech | L 36-39 | 13 | 22 | 267 | 59.1 | 1 | 1 | 76.7 | 5 | 33 | 6.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Virginia | W 45-31 | 11 | 21 | 137 | 52.4 | 2 | 0 | 64.7 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Georgia Tech | W 37-34 | 14 | 20 | 192 | 70.0 | 1 | 0 | 62.5 | 4 | -7 | -1.80 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Marshall | W 43-27 | 17 | 23 | 280 | 73.9 | 2 | 0 | 77.5 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ North Carolina | L 36-37 | 14 | 18 | 140 | 77.8 | 0 | 0 | 68.6 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Oklahoma State | L 38-45 | 14 | 29 | 237 | 48.3 | 1 | 1 | 59.8 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Penn State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-39 | 11 | 15 | 91 | 73.3 | 3 | 1 | 65.6 | 8 | 52 | 6.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 19 | 32 | 175 | 59.4 | 2 | 0 | 51.2 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2012-2014
Opening stop
Pittsburgh
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tennessee | 39 | 40 | 9.4 | 39 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 62 | 48.2 | 6 | 23 |
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 2,520 | 60.6 | 19.2 | 2,458 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2,520 | 60.6 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 3,141 | 65.9 | 13.4 | 621 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 3,141 | 65.9 | 13.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
330
Primary metric
330 total offense with 81.9 efficiency.
#2
North Carolina
303
Primary metric
Loss with 303 yards of offense and 62.6 efficiency.
303 total offense with 62.6 efficiency.
#3
Notre Dame
283
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
283 total offense with 65.2 efficiency.
#4
Virginia Tech
300
Primary metric
Loss with 300 yards of offense and 76.7 efficiency.
300 total offense with 76.7 efficiency.
#5
Clemson
326
Primary metric
Win with 326 yards of offense and 64.7 efficiency.
326 total offense with 64.7 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
3,141 primary output · 65.9 efficiency · 13.4 usage
64.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
64.3
3,141 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Pittsburgh
61.7
2,520 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 19.2 usage
8
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
21
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8913
Bartram Trail · Jacksonville, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
5,762
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Nathan Peterman quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit