Usage Score
13.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Pittsburgh
Nathan Peterman
QB • 6'2" • Fruit Cove, FL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Nathan Peterman is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
65.9
Consistency
77.9
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
12131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tennessee • Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nathan Peterman, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Nathan Peterman is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Nathan Peterman played QB for Tennessee and Pittsburgh. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nathan Peterman recorded 5,236 passing yards, 526 rushing yards, and 9 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Pittsburgh.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 3,141 primary output with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
241.6
Efficiency
65.9
Usage
13.4
Consistency
77.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 248. Unknown: 167. Penn State: 143. Oklahoma State: 270. North Carolina: 159. Marshall: 298. Georgia Tech: 185. Virginia: 163. Virginia Tech: 300. Miami: 312. Clemson: 326. Duke: 240. Syracuse: 330
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 21 by 62.5. Unknown: 35 by 51.2. Penn State: 23 by 65.6. Oklahoma State: 38 by 59.8. North Carolina: 24 by 68.6. Marshall: 28 by 77.5. Georgia Tech: 24 by 62.5. Virginia: 26 by 64.7. Virginia Tech: 27 by 76.7. Miami: 43 by 59.2. Clemson: 43 by 64.7. Duke: 22 by 61.6. Syracuse: 24 by 81.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins240.7 · Games = 7 · -17.1 vs Losses
Losses257.8 · Games = 5 · +17.1 vs Wins
First Half210 · Games = 7 · -68.5 vs Second Half
Second Half278.5 · Games = 6 · +68.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
81.9 vs Syracuse
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Northwestern | L 24-31 | 13 | 18 | 253 | 72.2 | 1 | 1 | 62.5 | 3 | -5 | -1.70 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Syracuse3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 76-61 | 9 | 18 | 251 | 50.0 | 4 | 1 | 81.9 | 6 | 79 | 13.20 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Duke3+ TD | W 56-14 | 11 | 18 | 237 | 61.1 | 3 | 1 | 61.6 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Clemson300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 43-42 | 22 | 37 | 308 | 59.5 | 5 | 0 | 64.7 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Miami | L 28-51 | 17 | 35 | 287 | 48.6 | 2 | 1 | 59.2 | 8 | 25 | 3.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Virginia Tech | L 36-39 | 13 | 22 | 267 | 59.1 | 1 | 1 | 76.7 | 5 | 33 | 6.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Virginia | W 45-31 | 11 | 21 | 137 | 52.4 | 2 | 0 | 64.7 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Georgia Tech | W 37-34 | 14 | 20 | 192 | 70.0 | 1 | 0 | 62.5 | 4 | -7 | -1.80 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Marshall | W 43-27 | 17 | 23 | 280 | 73.9 | 2 | 0 | 77.5 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ North Carolina | L 36-37 | 14 | 18 | 140 | 77.8 | 0 | 0 | 68.6 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Oklahoma State | L 38-45 | 14 | 29 | 237 | 48.3 | 1 | 1 | 59.8 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Penn State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-39 | 11 | 15 | 91 | 73.3 | 3 | 1 | 65.6 | 8 | 52 | 6.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 19 | 32 | 175 | 59.4 | 2 | 0 | 51.2 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2012-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Pittsburgh
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tennessee | 39 | 40 | 9.4 | 39 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 62 | 48.2 | 6 | 23 |
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 2,520 | 60.6 | 19.2 | 2,458 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2,520 | 60.6 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 3,141 | 65.9 | 13.4 | 621 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 3,141 | 65.9 | 13.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
330
Primary metric
330 total offense with 81.9 efficiency.
#2
North Carolina
303
Primary metric
Loss with 303 yards of offense and 62.6 efficiency.
303 total offense with 62.6 efficiency.
#3
Notre Dame
283
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
283 total offense with 65.2 efficiency.
#4
Virginia Tech
300
Primary metric
Loss with 300 yards of offense and 76.7 efficiency.
300 total offense with 76.7 efficiency.
#5
Clemson
326
Primary metric
Win with 326 yards of offense and 64.7 efficiency.
326 total offense with 64.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
3,141 primary output · 65.9 efficiency · 13.4 usage
64.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
64.3
3,141 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Pittsburgh
61.7
2,520 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 19.2 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
21
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8913
Bartram Trail · Jacksonville, FL
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
5,762
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.