Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Tulsa
LB • 6'1" • Tulsa, OK, USA
Matt Linscott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.4
Efficiency
40.3
Consistency
37.1
Season Value
46.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Linscott, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa. Matt Linscott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.3 disruption score.
Matt Linscott played LB for Tulsa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Matt Linscott recorded 80 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Tulsa paired 20 primary output with 40.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
40.3
Usage
8.4
Consistency
37.1
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 0. San José State: 0. Ohio State: 0. North Carolina A&T: 2. Fresno State: 2. SMU: 1. Houston: 0. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 3. East Carolina: 4. Navy: 0. UCF: 6. Cincinnati: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. San José State: 5 by 20.8. Ohio State: 7 by 29.2. North Carolina A&T: 8 by 53.3. Fresno State: 2 by 28.3. SMU: 12 by 60. Houston: 10 by 41.7. Tulane: 3 by 12.5. Memphis: 5 by 50.8. East Carolina: 6 by 65. Navy: 9 by 37.5. UCF: 6 by 75. Cincinnati: 4 by 36.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
75 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/19 | vs Central Michigan | W 55-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs CincinnatiSplash game | W 40-37 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCFSplash game | W 35-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Navy | L 40-42 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | vs East Carolina2+ sacks · Splash game | W 45-24 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ MemphisSplash game | W 59-30 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tulane | W 50-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Houston10+ tackles | L 31-38 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs SMU10+ tackles | W 43-40 | 12 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Fresno StateSplash game | W 48-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs North Carolina A&TSplash game | W 58-21 | 8 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 3-48 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs San José State | W 45-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 20 | 40.3 | 8.4 | 19 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 20 | 40.3 | 8.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UCF
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 66 takeover score.
#2
UL Monroe
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
East Carolina
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
#4
Memphis
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 37.9 takeover score.
#5
North Carolina A&T
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
20 primary output · 40.3 efficiency · 8.4 usage
46.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
46.4
20 primary · 40.3 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Tulsa
41.7
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
2
Impact games
6
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
80
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.