Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2012-2013Texas Tech
Sadale Foster
RB • 5'7" • Riverside, CA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Sadale Foster leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
58.2
Consistency
38.7
Season Value
42.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Texas Tech
12121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sadale Foster, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Texas Tech. Sadale Foster leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.2 efficiency.
Sadale Foster played RB for Texas Tech. Across 2 tracked seasons, Sadale Foster recorded 642 rushing yards, 253 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Texas Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 539 primary output with 48.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with 104 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
29.7
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
5.6
Consistency
38.7
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 14. SMU: 7. Stephen F. Austin: 13. Texas State: 55. Kansas: 61. Iowa State: 104. West Virginia: 24. Oklahoma: 8. Oklahoma State: -2. Kansas State: 35. Baylor: 27. Texas: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 5 by 19.5. SMU: 1 by 58.3. Stephen F. Austin: 2 by 39.6. Texas State: 2 by 100. Kansas: 8 by 81.8. Iowa State: 11 by 89.4. West Virginia: 2 by 93.8. Oklahoma: 2 by 41.7. Oklahoma State: 1 by 0. Kansas State: 6 by 63.9. Baylor: 5 by 64.7. Texas: 2 by 45.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins39.7 · Games = 7 · +24.1 vs Losses
Losses15.6 · Games = 5 · -24.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | vs Arizona State | W 37-23 | 4 | 5 | 1.30 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2.8 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Texas | L 16-41 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Baylor | L 34-63 | 4 | 27 | 6.80 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Kansas State | L 26-49 | 3 | 19 | 6.30 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Oklahoma State | L 34-52 | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 | — | — | -2 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Oklahoma | L 30-38 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ West Virginia | W 37-27 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 12 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Iowa State | W 42-35 | 9 | 87 | 9.70 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 9.5 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Kansas | W 54-16 | 3 | 34 | 11.30 | 0 | 5 | 27 | 7.6 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Texas State | W 33-7 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 55 | 27.5 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Stephen F. Austin | W 61-13 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6.5 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ SMU | W 41-23 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Texas Tech | 539 | 48.4 | 13.4 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 539 | 48.4 | 13.4 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas Tech | 356 | 58.2 | 5.6 | -183 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 356 | 58.2 | 5.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with 104 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
104
Primary metric
104 scrimmage yards and 13.8 usage.
#2
West Virginia
82
Primary metric
Win with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
82 scrimmage yards and 16.1 usage.
#3
New Mexico
64
Primary metric
Win with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 12.8 usage.
#4
Texas State
55
Primary metric
Win with 55 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
55 scrimmage yards and 3 usage.
#5
Oklahoma
70
Primary metric
Loss with 70 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
70 scrimmage yards and 24.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Texas Tech
539 primary output · 48.4 efficiency · 13.4 usage
57.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · Texas Tech
57.1
539 primary · 48.4 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Texas Tech
42.1
356 primary · 58.2 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
895
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Sadale Foster
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.