Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2012-2016UCLA
Nate Iese
TE • 6'3" • Elk Grove, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Nate Iese reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
89.6
Consistency
37.5
Season Value
59.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UCLA
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Iese, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UCLA. Nate Iese reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UCLA paired 400 primary output with 89.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 89.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
50
Efficiency
89.6
Usage
12
Consistency
37.5
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 10. BYU: 34. Stanford: 89. Arizona: 16. Arizona State: 60. Washington State: 16. Utah: 146. Oregon State: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 1 by 66.7. BYU: 2 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 4 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 53.3. Utah: 8 by 100. Oregon State: 2 by 96.7
Split Comparison
Wins22.3 · n=4 · -55.5 vs Losses
Losses77.8 · n=4 · +55.5 vs Wins
First Half37.3 · n=4 · -25.5 vs Second Half
Second Half62.8 · n=4 · +25.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/13 | vs Oregon State | W 38-24 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Utah100 receiving yards · High volume | L 45-52 | — | 8 | 146 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 2 | 50 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Washington State | L 21-27 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Arizona State | L 20-23 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona | W 45-24 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Stanford | L 13-22 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ BYU | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs UNLV | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCLA
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCLA | 3 | 20 | 6.3 | 3 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 70 | 36.7 | 8.2 | 67 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 96 | 46.7 | 6.9 | 26 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 400 | 89.6 | 12 | 304 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146
Primary metric
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Stanford
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
400 primary output · 89.6 efficiency · 12 usage
59.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · UCLA
31.8
3 primary · 20 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UCLA
31.6
70 primary · 36.7 efficiency · 8.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8481
Sheldon · Sacramento, CA
- Committed To
- UCLA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
569
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.