Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2025-2025Middle Tennessee
WR • 6'3" • 200 lbs • Fresno, CA, USA
Nahzae Cox reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.5
Efficiency
71.3
Consistency
61
Season Value
62.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nahzae Cox, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Nahzae Cox reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Nahzae Cox played WR for Middle Tennessee. Across 1 tracked season, Nahzae Cox recorded 473 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 473 primary output with 71.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
47.3
Efficiency
71.3
Usage
17.5
Consistency
61
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Austin Peay: 50. Wisconsin: 75. Nevada: 45. Marshall: 94. Kennesaw State: 77. Missouri State: 12. Delaware: 37. Jacksonville State: 34. Florida International: 22. Sam Houston: 27
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Austin Peay: 6 by 55.6. Wisconsin: 3 by 100. Nevada: 5 by 60. Marshall: 6 by 100. Kennesaw State: 4 by 100. Missouri State: 4 by 20. Delaware: 3 by 82.2. Jacksonville State: 4 by 56.7. Florida International: 3 by 48.9. Sam Houston: 2 by 90
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kennesaw State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | vs Sam Houston | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Florida International | L 30-56 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Wed 10/29 | vs Jacksonville State | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Wed 10/22 | @ Delaware | L 28-31 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Wed 10/8 | vs Missouri State | L 20-22 | — | 4 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kennesaw State | L 16-24 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Marshall | L 28-42 | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Nevada | W 14-13 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-42 | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Austin Peay2+ TD | L 14-34 | — | 6 | 50 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 2 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 473 | 71.3 | 17.5 | — |
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kennesaw State
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Austin Peay
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 55.6 efficiency score.
#5
Delaware
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
473 primary output · 71.3 efficiency · 17.5 usage
62.5
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
473
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 10 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.