Usage Score
14.5
Player Dossier
2025-2025Central Michigan
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Lake Forest, CA, USA
Collin Payne reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.5
Efficiency
60
Consistency
32.8
Season Value
51.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Collin Payne, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Collin Payne reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Collin Payne played WR for Central Michigan. Across 1 tracked season, Collin Payne recorded 87 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 87 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
21.8
Efficiency
60
Usage
14.5
Consistency
32.8
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San José State: 3. Pittsburgh: 18. Akron: 3. Bowling Green: 63
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 1 by 20. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Akron: 1 by 20. Bowling Green: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 87 | 60 | 14.5 | — |
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San José State
3
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
3
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
87 primary output · 60 efficiency · 14.5 usage
51.8
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
87
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 4 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.