Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2025-2025Central Michigan
QB • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Philadelphia, MS, USA
Marcus Beamon is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
18.1
Efficiency
32.6
Consistency
56.6
Season Value
51.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marcus Beamon, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan. Marcus Beamon is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Marcus Beamon played QB for Central Michigan. Across 1 tracked season, Marcus Beamon recorded 35 passing yards, 88 rushing yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 123 primary output with 32.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 32.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with 52 yards of offense and 80.3 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Primary Metric / G
24.6
Efficiency
32.6
Usage
18.1
Consistency
56.6
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 0. Western Michigan: 52. Buffalo: 29. Kent State: 44. Toledo: -2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 2 by 0. Western Michigan: 10 by 80.3. Buffalo: 12 by 31.6. Kent State: 11 by 51.3. Toledo: 2 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
80.3 vs Western Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Central Michigan | 123 | 32.6 | 18.1 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 123 | 32.6 | 18.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Loss with 52 yards of offense and 80.3 efficiency.
52
Primary metric
52 total offense with 80.3 efficiency.
#2
Kent State
44
Primary metric
Win with 44 yards of offense and 51.3 efficiency.
44 total offense with 51.3 efficiency.
#3
Buffalo
29
Primary metric
Win with 29 yards of offense and 31.6 efficiency.
29 total offense with 31.6 efficiency.
#4
Northwestern
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 yards of offense and 0 efficiency.
0 total offense with 0 efficiency.
#5
Toledo
-2
Primary metric
Loss with -2 yards of offense and 0 efficiency.
-2 total offense with 0 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
123 primary output · 32.6 efficiency · 18.1 usage
51.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
51.8
123 primary · 32.6 efficiency · 18.1 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
1
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
123
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.