Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2025-2025Vanderbilt
WR • 5'10" • 175 lbs • Topeka, KS, USA
Tre Richardson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.2
Efficiency
82.8
Consistency
60.8
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre Richardson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Tre Richardson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tre Richardson played WR for Vanderbilt. Across 1 tracked season, Tre Richardson recorded 62 rushing yards, 810 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Vanderbilt.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 810 primary output with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.3
Efficiency
82.8
Usage
21.2
Consistency
60.8
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 127. Unknown: 74. Virginia Tech: 54. South Carolina: 34. Georgia State: 0. Utah State: 74. Alabama: 6. LSU: 0. Missouri: 62. Texas: 21. Auburn: 124. Kentucky: 159. Tennessee: 75
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 6 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 98.7. Virginia Tech: 3 by 100. South Carolina: 4 by 56.7. Utah State: 6 by 82.2. Alabama: 2 by 20. Missouri: 4 by 100. Texas: 2 by 70. Auburn: 3 by 100. Kentucky: 6 by 100. Tennessee: 6 by 83.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Iowa100 receiving yards | L 27-34 | — | 6 | 127 | 14.6 | 21.20 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Tennessee | W 45-24 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Kentucky100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-17 | — | 6 | 159 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 3 | 71 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards | W 45-38 | — | 3 | 124 | 41.3 | 41.30 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Texas | L 31-34 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Missouri | W 17-10 | — | 4 | 62 | 12.2 | 15.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs LSU | W 31-24 | — | — | — | 7.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Alabama | L 14-30 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Utah State | W 55-35 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Georgia State | W 70-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ South Carolina | W 31-7 | — | 4 | 34 | 7.6 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Virginia Tech | W 44-20 | — | 3 | 54 | 17.2 | 18 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 74 | 12.5 | 14.80 | 0 | 25 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Vanderbilt
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 810 | 82.8 | 21.2 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 810 | 82.8 | 21.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
159
Primary metric
159 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
124
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
74
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 98.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Vanderbilt
810 primary output · 82.8 efficiency · 21.2 usage
66.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
66.2
810 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 21.2 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8444
Highland Park · Topeka, KS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
810
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.