Usage Score
27.1
Player Dossier
2025-2025Pittsburgh
QB • 6'2" • 215 lbs • Oregon, OH, USA
Mason Heintschel is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
27.1
Efficiency
60.1
Consistency
67.4
Season Value
63.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mason Heintschel, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Mason Heintschel is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Mason Heintschel played QB for Pittsburgh. Across 1 tracked season, Mason Heintschel recorded 2,357 passing yards, 88 rushing yards, and 18 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 2,445 primary output with 60.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 60.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
244.5
Efficiency
60.1
Usage
27.1
Consistency
67.4
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 247. Central Michigan: 36. Boston College: 351. Florida State: 385. Syracuse: 166. NC State: 430. Stanford: 325. Notre Dame: 133. Georgia Tech: 197. Miami: 175
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 51 by 51.5. Central Michigan: 4 by 83.3. Boston College: 51 by 66.7. Florida State: 45 by 69.3. Syracuse: 36 by 51.6. NC State: 51 by 63.8. Stanford: 46 by 58.1. Notre Dame: 42 by 44. Georgia Tech: 37 by 61. Miami: 39 by 52
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Central Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ East Carolina | L 17-23 | 25 | 40 | 256 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | 51.5 | 11 | -9 | -0.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Miami | L 7-38 | 22 | 32 | 199 | 68.8 | 1 | 1 | 52 | 7 | -24 | -3.40 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Georgia Tech3+ TD | W 42-28 | 20 | 27 | 226 | 74.1 | 2 | 0 | 61 | 10 | -29 | -2.90 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Notre Dame | L 15-37 | 16 | 33 | 126 | 48.5 | 0 | 1 | 44 | 9 | 7 | 0.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Stanford300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 35-20 | 23 | 38 | 304 | 60.5 | 3 | 2 | 58.1 | 8 | 21 | 2.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs NC State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 53-34 | 28 | 48 | 423 | 58.3 | 3 | 0 | 63.8 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Syracuse | W 30-13 | 13 | 24 | 143 | 54.2 | 0 | 1 | 51.6 | 12 | 23 | 1.90 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida State300-yard game · Dual-threat | W 34-31 | 21 | 29 | 321 | 72.4 | 2 | 2 | 69.3 | 16 | 64 | 4 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Boston College300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 48-7 | 30 | 41 | 323 | 73.2 | 4 | 0 | 66.7 | 10 | 28 | 2.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Central Michigan | W 45-17 | 3 | 4 | 36 | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | 83.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 2,445 | 60.1 | 27.1 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2,445 | 60.1 | 27.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
385
Primary metric
385 total offense with 69.3 efficiency.
#2
NC State
430
Primary metric
Win with 430 yards of offense and 63.8 efficiency.
430 total offense with 63.8 efficiency.
#3
Boston College
351
Primary metric
Win with 351 yards of offense and 66.7 efficiency.
351 total offense with 66.7 efficiency.
#4
Stanford
325
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
325 total offense with 58.1 efficiency.
#5
Central Michigan
36
Primary metric
Win with 36 yards of offense and 83.3 efficiency.
36 total offense with 83.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh
2,445 primary output · 60.1 efficiency · 27.1 usage
63.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
63.7
2,445 primary · 60.1 efficiency · 27.1 usage
4
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
5
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8772
Clay · Oregon, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
2,445
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.