Usage Score
33.9
Player Dossier
2024-2025Missouri
RB • 5'10" • 206 lbs • Oma, MS, USA
Ahmad Hardy leans workhorse runner traits and 62.9 efficiency.
Usage Score
33.9
Efficiency
62.9
Consistency
62.8
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Missouri
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ahmad Hardy, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Missouri. Ahmad Hardy leans workhorse runner traits and 62.9 efficiency.
Ahmad Hardy played RB for UL Monroe and Missouri. Across 2 tracked seasons, Ahmad Hardy recorded 3,001 rushing yards, 94 receiving yards, and 29 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Missouri.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Missouri paired 1,671 primary output with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UL Monroe, Missouri.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
128.5
Efficiency
62.9
Usage
33.9
Consistency
62.8
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia: 89. Central Arkansas: 100. Kansas: 114. Louisiana: 250. South Carolina: 138. Massachusetts: 130. Alabama: 54. Auburn: 69. Vanderbilt: 99. Texas A&M: 114. Mississippi State: 300. Oklahoma: 57. Arkansas: 157
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia: 15 by 61.8. Central Arkansas: 10 by 91.7. Kansas: 26 by 46.3. Louisiana: 22 by 97.3. South Carolina: 22 by 65.3. Massachusetts: 24 by 56.4. Alabama: 14 by 43.2. Auburn: 25 by 26.6. Vanderbilt: 21 by 50. Texas A&M: 14 by 83.9. Mississippi State: 25 by 100. Oklahoma: 17 by 34.9. Arkansas: 27 by 60.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | vs Virginia | L 7-13 | 15 | 89 | 5.90 | 0 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Arkansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-17 | 27 | 157 | 5.80 | 1 | — | — | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Oklahoma | L 6-17 | 17 | 57 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 49-27 | 25 | 300 | 12 | 3 | — | — | 12 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Texas A&M100 rush yards | L 17-38 | 13 | 109 | 8.40 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8.1 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Vanderbilt | L 10-17 | 20 | 97 | 4.90 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Auburn2+ TD | W 23-17 | 24 | 58 | 2.40 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 2.8 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Alabama | L 24-27 | 12 | 52 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Massachusetts100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 42-6 | 24 | 130 | 5.40 | 3 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs South Carolina100 rush yards | W 29-20 | 22 | 138 | 6.30 | 1 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Louisiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-10 | 22 | 250 | 11.40 | 3 | — | — | 11.4 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kansas100 rush yards | W 42-31 | 25 | 112 | 4.50 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.4 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Central Arkansas100 rush yards | W 61-6 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 1 | — | — | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UL Monroe
2024
Opening stop
Missouri
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 1,424 | 57.8 | 41.8 | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Missouri | 1,671 | 62.9 | 33.9 | 247 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Missouri | 1,671 | 62.9 | 33.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
300
Primary metric
300 scrimmage yards and 53.2 usage.
#2
Arkansas State
208
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
208 scrimmage yards and 65.3 usage.
#3
Marshall
207
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
207 scrimmage yards and 46.3 usage.
#4
Louisiana
183
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
183 scrimmage yards and 56.9 usage.
#5
Southern Miss
174
Primary metric
Win with 174 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
174 scrimmage yards and 32.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Missouri
1,671 primary output · 62.9 efficiency · 33.9 usage
64.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Missouri
64.9
1,671 primary · 62.9 efficiency · 33.9 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · UL Monroe
63.4
1,424 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 41.8 usage
16
100+ rush yards
7
150+ scrimmage yards
7
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3,095
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.