Usage / Role
38%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2015Rutgers
RB • 6'0" • Glassboro, NJ, USA
Paul James leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.3 efficiency.
Usage / Role
38%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
51
Solid production for a back
Reliability
44
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
68
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers
Snapshot
Player Story
Paul James built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a running back from Glassboro, NJ wearing No. 34, spending time with Rutgers. The clearest part of Paul James' career was his backfield work: 1,810...
Read the storyPaul James, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers. Paul James leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.3 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 45.3 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 9 | 70 | 48 | 22 | 0 | 80.1 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 9 | 918 | 833 | 85 | 9 | 80.1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 4 | 483 | 363 | 120 | 7 | 71.1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 10 | 584 | 544 | 40 | 5 | 59.8 |
Related Context
Paul James played RB for Rutgers. Across 5 tracked seasons, Paul James recorded 1,810 rushing yards, 267 receiving yards, and 21 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Rutgers.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Rutgers paired 988 primary output with 55.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
58.4
Efficiency
54.3
Usage
18.6
Consistency
72.8
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Norfolk State: 82. Washington State: 25. Penn State: 18. Kansas: 76. Michigan State: 74. Indiana: 48. Ohio State: 56. Wisconsin: 18. Army: 116. Maryland: 71
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Norfolk State: 15 by 56.9. Washington State: 7 by 38.8. Penn State: 11 by 11.2. Kansas: 10 by 71.3. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Indiana: 8 by 68.8. Ohio State: 10 by 58.3. Wisconsin: 7 by 27.4. Army: 18 by 67.1. Maryland: 17 by 43.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Maryland | L 41-46 | 17 | 71 | 4.20 | 1 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Army100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-21 | 18 | 116 | 6.40 | 3 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-48 | 6 | 16 | 2.70 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2.6 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Ohio State | L 7-49 | 10 | 56 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Indiana | W 55-52 | 6 | 42 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs Michigan State | L 24-31 | 2 | 74 | 37 | 0 | — | — | 37 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Kansas | W 27-14 | 9 | 57 | 6.30 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 7.6 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ Penn State | L 3-28 | 10 | 7 | 0.70 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 1.6 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Washington State | L 34-37 | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.6 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Norfolk State | W 63-13 | 15 | 82 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
Player Story
Paul James built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a running back from Glassboro, NJ wearing No. 34, spending time with Rutgers. The clearest part of Paul James' career was his backfield work: 1,810 rushing yards, 323 carries, 19 rushing touchdowns, and 267 receiving yards across 24 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2013 with Rutgers. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 267 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 24 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Rutgers.
The arc is straightforward: Paul James moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 22 | 45.8 | 11.6 | 22 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 988 | 55.9 | 37.1 | 966 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 988 | 55.9 | 37.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 483 | 65.8 | 31.3 | -505 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 584 | 54.3 | 18.6 | 101 |
#1 Featured game
vs Eastern Michigan
Week 3 · W 28-10
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
222
Scrimmage Yards
97.3 takeover
222 scrimmage yards and 59.5 usage.
#2
@ Fresno State
Week 1 · L 51-52
191
Scrimmage Yards
90.2 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
191 scrimmage yards and 40.4 usage.
#3
@ Army
Week 12 · W 31-21
116
Scrimmage Yards
89 takeover
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 35.3 usage.
#4
@ Washington State
Week 1 · W 41-38
173
Scrimmage Yards
87.4 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
173 scrimmage yards and 51.8 usage.
#5
vs Howard
Week 2 · W 38-25
143
Scrimmage Yards
75.1 takeover
Win with 143 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
143 scrimmage yards and 28.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
988 primary output · 55.9 efficiency · 37.1 usage
80.1
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
80.1
988 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 37.1 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Rutgers
71.1
483 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 31.3 usage
6
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.