Usage Score
23.6
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTSA
David Glasco II
RB • 5'10" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
David Glasco II leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
36.6
Consistency
45.6
Season Value
50.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA
121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Glasco II, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA. David Glasco II leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.6 efficiency.
David Glasco II played RB for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, David Glasco II recorded 1,603 rushing yards, 102 receiving yards, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTSA paired 609 primary output with 50.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 36.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Win with 111 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
49
Efficiency
36.6
Usage
23.6
Consistency
45.6
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 81. Arizona: 35. Oklahoma State: 27. Florida Atlantic: 85. New Mexico: 28. Florida International: 4. Louisiana Tech: 14. UTEP: 16. Rice: 58. Southern Miss: 111. Western Kentucky: 30. North Texas: 99
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 25 by 33.8. Arizona: 12 by 30.4. Oklahoma State: 9 by 31.3. Florida Atlantic: 18 by 49.2. New Mexico: 11 by 26.5. Florida International: 9 by 4.6. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 12.1. UTEP: 5 by 33.3. Rice: 11 by 56. Southern Miss: 17 by 69.4. Western Kentucky: 13 by 24. North Texas: 15 by 68.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins73.8 · Games = 4 · +37.1 vs Losses
Losses36.6 · Games = 8 · -37.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
69.4 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs North Texas | W 34-27 | 15 | 99 | 6.60 | 1 | — | — | 6.6 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | 13 | 30 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Southern Miss100 rush yards | W 12-10 | 16 | 108 | 6.80 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6.5 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 7-17 | 9 | 49 | 5.40 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UTEP | L 0-34 | 5 | 16 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-27 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1.4 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida International | W 16-13 | 9 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | — | — | 0.4 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs New Mexico | L 9-21 | 11 | 28 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 37-41 | 18 | 85 | 4.70 | 1 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-43 | 9 | 27 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Arizona | L 23-26 | 12 | 35 | 2.90 | 1 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Houston2+ TD | W 27-7 | 25 | 81 | 3.20 | 2 | — | — | 3.2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 609 | 50.5 | 19.8 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 508 | 46.3 | 17.4 | -101 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 588 | 36.6 | 23.6 | 80 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
135
Primary metric
135 scrimmage yards and 39.6 usage.
#2
Northwestern Oklahoma State
69
Primary metric
Win with 69 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
69 scrimmage yards and 7.8 usage.
#3
South Alabama
73
Primary metric
Win with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#4
Southern Miss
111
Primary metric
Win with 111 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
111 scrimmage yards and 27 usage.
#5
North Texas
99
Primary metric
Win with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
99 scrimmage yards and 29.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
609 primary output · 50.5 efficiency · 19.8 usage
62
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
50.6
588 primary · 36.6 efficiency · 23.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
50.5
508 primary · 46.3 efficiency · 17.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,705
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring David Glasco II
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.