Usage Score
9.9
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTSA
Brandon Armstrong
RB • 5'6" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Brandon Armstrong leans balanced backfield option traits and 41 efficiency.
Efficiency
41
Consistency
30.2
Season Value
38.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA
121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Armstrong, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA. Brandon Armstrong leans balanced backfield option traits and 41 efficiency.
Brandon Armstrong played RB for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Brandon Armstrong recorded 515 rushing yards, 393 receiving yards, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTSA paired 423 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 41 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
27.7
Efficiency
41
Usage
9.9
Consistency
30.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 37. Oklahoma State: 15. Florida Atlantic: 13. New Mexico: -1. Florida International: 85. Louisiana Tech: -5. UTEP: 7. Rice: 20. Southern Miss: 7. Western Kentucky: 33. North Texas: 94
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 7 by 53.3. Oklahoma State: 6 by 21.7. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 16.7. New Mexico: 2 by 0. Florida International: 6 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 0. UTEP: 5 by 14.6. Rice: 4 by 58.3. Southern Miss: 1 by 58.3. Western Kentucky: 6 by 42.9. North Texas: 10 by 85.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins62 · Games = 3 · +47.1 vs Losses
Losses14.9 · Games = 8 · -47.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs North Texas | W 34-27 | 9 | 67 | 7.40 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 9.4 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | 5 | 16 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5.5 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Southern Miss | W 12-10 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 7-17 | 3 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UTEP | L 0-34 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | — | — | 1.4 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-27 | 4 | -5 | -1.30 | 0 | — | — | -1.3 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida International | W 16-13 | 3 | 40 | 13.30 | 0 | 3 | 45 | 14.2 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs New Mexico | L 9-21 | 2 | -1 | -0.50 | 0 | — | — | -0.5 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 37-41 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3.3 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-43 | 5 | 9 | 1.80 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2.5 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Arizona | L 23-26 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 5.3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 180 | 43.1 | 7.7 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 423 | 67.8 | 7.5 | 243 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 305 | 41 | 9.9 | -118 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with 98 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
98
Primary metric
98 scrimmage yards and 25.6 usage.
#2
UAB
105
Primary metric
Win with 105 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
105 scrimmage yards and 8.5 usage.
#3
North Texas
94
Primary metric
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
94 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
#4
Florida International
85
Primary metric
Win with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 10.2 usage.
#5
McNeese
36
Primary metric
Win with 36 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
36 scrimmage yards and 3.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
423 primary output · 67.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
55.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
38.3
305 primary · 41 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
35.2
180 primary · 43.1 efficiency · 7.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
908
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Brandon Armstrong
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.