Usage Score
17.4
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTSA
WR • 5'11" • Edna, TX, USA
Kam Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.4
Efficiency
44.6
Consistency
64
Season Value
48.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kam Jones, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA. Kam Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kam Jones played WR for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kam Jones recorded 35 passing yards, 545 rushing yards, and 900 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTSA paired 323 primary output with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 44.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
19.3
Efficiency
44.6
Usage
17.4
Consistency
64
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 17. Arizona: 33. Oklahoma State: 4. Florida Atlantic: 14. New Mexico: 38. Florida International: 24. Louisiana Tech: 24. UTEP: 14. Rice: -3. Southern Miss: 36. Western Kentucky: 11. North Texas: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 4 by 28.3. Arizona: 3 by 73.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 26.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 46.7. New Mexico: 3 by 84.4. Florida International: 4 by 40. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 80. UTEP: 2 by 46.7. Rice: 1 by 0. Southern Miss: 6 by 40. Western Kentucky: 3 by 24.4. North Texas: 3 by 44.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
84.4 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs North Texas | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.5 | 6.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | — | 3 | 11 | 0.3 | 3.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Southern Miss | W 12-10 | — | 6 | 36 | 5.9 | 6 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 7-17 | — | 1 | -3 | 3.5 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UTEP | L 0-34 | — | 2 | 14 | 3.8 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-27 | — | 2 | 24 | 5.6 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida International | W 16-13 | — | 4 | 24 | 5.5 | 6 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs New Mexico | L 9-21 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 37-41 | — | 2 | 14 | 4.2 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-43 | — | 1 | 4 | 1.5 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Arizona | L 23-26 | — | 3 | 33 | 7.2 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Houston | W 27-7 | — | 4 | 17 | 4.8 | 4.30 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 323 | 78.5 | 13.4 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 345 | 60.7 | 14.6 | 22 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 232 | 44.6 | 17.4 | -113 |
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
323 primary output · 78.5 efficiency · 13.4 usage
61.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
57.1
345 primary · 60.7 efficiency · 14.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
48.3
232 primary · 44.6 efficiency · 17.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
900
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.