Usage Score
11.2
Player Dossier
2011-2014Notre Dame
Ben Koyack
TE • 6'5" • Oil City, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ben Koyack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
60.9
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
111213131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Koyack, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame. Ben Koyack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 317 primary output with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
24.4
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
11.2
Consistency
60.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 12. Rice: 51. Michigan: 14. Purdue: 32. Syracuse: 16. Stanford: 28. North Carolina: 9. Florida State: 29. Navy: 54. Arizona State: 34. Northwestern: 22. Louisville: 5. USC: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 1 by 80. Rice: 3 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 46.7. Purdue: 5 by 42.7. Syracuse: 3 by 35.6. Stanford: 2 by 93.3. North Carolina: 1 by 60. Florida State: 2 by 96.7. Navy: 5 by 72. Arizona State: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 2 by 73.3. Louisville: 1 by 33.3. USC: 1 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins27 · n=8 · +6.8 vs Losses
Losses20.2 · n=5 · -6.8 vs Wins
First Half23.1 · n=7 · -2.7 vs Second Half
Second Half25.8 · n=6 · +2.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/30 | @ LSU | W 31-28 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ USC | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Louisville | L 28-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Northwestern | L 40-43 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Arizona State | L 31-55 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/2 | @ Navy | W 49-39 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Florida State | L 27-31 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs North Carolina | W 50-43 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Stanford | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 9/28 | @ Syracuse | W 31-15 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Purdue | W 30-14 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Michigan | W 31-0 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Rice | W 48-17 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 5 | 33.3 | 4.2 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 39 | 68.9 | 5 | 34 |
| 2013 Postseason | Notre Dame | 171 | 96.7 | 11.9 | 132 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 171 | 96.7 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Notre Dame | 317 | 69.8 | 11.2 | 146 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 317 | 69.8 | 11.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 72 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
317 primary output · 69.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
60.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
60.5
317 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Notre Dame
56
171 primary · 96.7 efficiency · 11.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9765
Oil City · Oil City, PA
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
532
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.