Usage Score
11.2
Player Dossier
2011-2014Notre Dame
TE • 6'5" • Oil City, PA, USA
Ben Koyack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.2
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
60.9
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Koyack, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame. Ben Koyack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ben Koyack played TE for Notre Dame. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ben Koyack recorded 532 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 317 primary output with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
24.4
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
11.2
Consistency
60.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 12. Rice: 51. Michigan: 14. Purdue: 32. Syracuse: 16. Stanford: 28. North Carolina: 9. Florida State: 29. Navy: 54. Arizona State: 34. Northwestern: 22. Louisville: 5. USC: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 1 by 80. Rice: 3 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 46.7. Purdue: 5 by 42.7. Syracuse: 3 by 35.6. Stanford: 2 by 93.3. North Carolina: 1 by 60. Florida State: 2 by 96.7. Navy: 5 by 72. Arizona State: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 2 by 73.3. Louisville: 1 by 33.3. USC: 1 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/30 | @ LSU | W 31-28 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ USC | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Louisville | L 28-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Northwestern | L 40-43 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Arizona State | L 31-55 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/2 | @ Navy | W 49-39 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Florida State | L 27-31 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs North Carolina | W 50-43 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Stanford | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 9/28 | @ Syracuse | W 31-15 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Purdue | W 30-14 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Michigan | W 31-0 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Rice | W 48-17 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 5 | 33.3 | 4.2 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 39 | 68.9 | 5 | 34 |
| 2013 Postseason | Notre Dame | 171 | 96.7 | 11.9 | 132 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 171 | 96.7 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Notre Dame | 317 | 69.8 | 11.2 | 146 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 317 | 69.8 | 11.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 72 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
317 primary output · 69.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
60.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
60.5
317 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Notre Dame
56
171 primary · 96.7 efficiency · 11.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9765
Oil City · Oil City, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
532
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.