Usage Score
8.1
Player Dossier
2011-2015Arizona State
WR • 6'4" • Glendale, AZ, USA
Gary Chambers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.1
Efficiency
82.8
Consistency
44.9
Season Value
59
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arizona State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gary Chambers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arizona State. Gary Chambers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Arizona State paired 486 primary output with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
37.4
Efficiency
82.8
Usage
8.1
Consistency
44.9
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 66. Texas A&M: 9. Unknown: 60. New Mexico: 24. USC: 103. UCLA: 38. Colorado: 24. Utah: 4. Oregon: 70. Washington State: 36. Washington: 24. Arizona: 5. California: 23
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 2 by 100. Texas A&M: 1 by 60. Unknown: 3 by 100. New Mexico: 1 by 100. USC: 5 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 80. Utah: 1 by 26.7. Oregon: 3 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 100. Washington: 1 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 33.3. California: 2 by 76.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/3 | vs West Virginia | L 42-43 | — | 2 | 66 | 33 | 33 | 1 | 58 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ California | L 46-48 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Arizona | W 52-37 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Washington | W 27-17 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Washington State | L 24-38 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 10/30 | vs Oregon | L 55-61 | — | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 1 | 39 |
| Sun 10/18 | @ Utah | L 18-34 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs Colorado | W 48-23 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ UCLA | W 38-23 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs USC100 receiving yards | L 14-42 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs New Mexico | W 34-10 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-38 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona State
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Arizona State | 204 | 83.8 | 6.3 | 204 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona State | 204 | 83.8 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Arizona State | 486 | 82.8 | 8.1 | 282 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 486 | 82.8 | 8.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
46
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
USC
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Arizona State
486 primary output · 82.8 efficiency · 8.1 usage
59
#2
2015 Regular Season · Arizona State
59
486 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 8.1 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Arizona State
48.9
204 primary · 83.8 efficiency · 6.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8175
Ironwood · Glendale, AZ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
690
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Gary Chambers quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit