Usage Score
13.7
Player Dossier
2011-2014TCU
WR • DeSoto, TX, USA
David Porter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.7
Efficiency
64
Consistency
48.9
Season Value
56.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Porter, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · TCU. David Porter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
David Porter played WR for TCU. Across 4 tracked seasons, David Porter recorded 55 passing yards, 501 receiving yards, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with TCU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
TCU paired 392 primary output with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
35.6
Efficiency
64
Usage
13.7
Consistency
48.9
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 15. Samford: 54. Minnesota: 59. SMU: 30. Oklahoma: 19. Baylor: 25. Oklahoma State: 18. Kansas State: 84. Kansas: 67. Texas: 7. Iowa State: 14
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 3 by 33.3. Samford: 5 by 72. Minnesota: 5 by 78.7. SMU: 2 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Baylor: 3 by 55.6. Oklahoma State: 3 by 40. Kansas State: 7 by 80. Kansas: 6 by 74.4. Texas: 2 by 23.3. Iowa State: 2 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Ole Miss | W 42-3 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs Iowa State | W 55-3 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Texas | W 48-10 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Kansas | W 34-30 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Kansas State | W 41-20 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-9 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Baylor | L 58-61 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Oklahoma | W 37-33 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ SMU | W 56-0 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Minnesota | W 30-7 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Samford | W 48-14 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | TCU | 109 | 82 | 7.9 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | TCU | 109 | 82 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | -109 |
| 2013 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | TCU | 392 | 64 | 13.7 | 392 |
| 2014 Regular Season | TCU | 392 | 64 | 13.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
Wyoming
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 74.4 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · TCU
392 primary output · 64 efficiency · 13.7 usage
56.7
#2
2014 Regular Season · TCU
56.7
392 primary · 64 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · TCU
49.2
109 primary · 82 efficiency · 7.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8759
Memorial · Eau Claire, WI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
501
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.