Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2025-2025Washington
Dezmen Roebuck
WR • 5'11" • 175 lbs • Marana, AZ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Dezmen Roebuck reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
44.1
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Washington
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dezmen Roebuck, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington. Dezmen Roebuck reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Dezmen Roebuck played WR for Washington. Across 1 tracked season, Dezmen Roebuck recorded 10 rushing yards, 560 receiving yards, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Washington.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Washington paired 560 primary output with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Washington
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
43.1
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
17.8
Consistency
44.1
Best Game by takeover score
Boise State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boise State: 6. Colorado State: 27. Unknown: 77. Washington State: 0. Ohio State: 58. Maryland: 61. Rutgers: 108. Michigan: 27. Illinois: 36. Wisconsin: 27. Purdue: 10. UCLA: 96. Oregon: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boise State: 1 by 40. Colorado State: 2 by 90. Unknown: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 4 by 96.7. Maryland: 4 by 100. Rutgers: 4 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 60. Illinois: 3 by 80. Wisconsin: 5 by 36. Purdue: 3 by 22.2. UCLA: 7 by 91.4. Oregon: 2 by 90
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins43 · Games = 8 · +8.3 vs Losses
Losses34.8 · Games = 4 · -8.3 vs Wins
First Half48.1 · Games = 7 · +11.0 vs Second Half
Second Half37.2 · Games = 6 · -11.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rutgers
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/14 | vs Boise State | W 38-10 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Oregon | L 14-26 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ UCLA | W 48-14 | — | 7 | 96 | 12.5 | 13.70 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Purdue | W 49-13 | — | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-13 | — | 5 | 27 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Illinois2+ TD | W 42-25 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Michigan | L 7-24 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 38-19 | — | 4 | 108 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 59 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Maryland | W 24-20 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Ohio State | L 6-24 | — | 4 | 58 | 12.8 | 14.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Washington State | W 59-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 47 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Colorado State | W 38-21 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Washington | 560 | 75.5 | 17.8 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington | 560 | 75.5 | 17.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
77
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio State
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Washington
560 primary output · 75.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
58.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Washington
58.9
560 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8642
Marana · Marana, AZ
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
560
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.