Usage Score
16.1
Player Dossier
2011-2015Stanford
WR • 6'4" • Seaford, NY, USA
Devon Cajuste reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.1
Efficiency
75.7
Consistency
33
Season Value
46.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devon Cajuste, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Stanford. Devon Cajuste reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Devon Cajuste played WR for Stanford. Across 5 tracked seasons, Devon Cajuste recorded 1,589 receiving yards and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Stanford paired 642 primary output with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
31.9
Efficiency
75.7
Usage
16.1
Consistency
33
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 8. Northwestern: 39. UCF: 24. USC: 21. Oregon State: 18. Arizona: 49. UCLA: 16. Washington: 10. Oregon: 37. California: 18. Notre Dame: 125. USC: 18
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 1 by 53.3. Northwestern: 4 by 65. UCF: 2 by 80. USC: 2 by 70. Oregon State: 2 by 60. Arizona: 3 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 53.3. Washington: 1 by 66.7. Oregon: 2 by 100. California: 2 by 60. Notre Dame: 5 by 100. USC: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Iowa | W 45-16 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs USC | W 41-22 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Notre Dame100 receiving yards | W 38-36 | — | 5 | 125 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 42 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs California | W 35-22 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Oregon | L 36-38 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Washington | W 31-14 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 10/16 | vs UCLA | W 56-35 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Arizona | W 55-17 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Oregon State | W 42-24 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ USC | W 41-31 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs UCF | W 31-7 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Northwestern | L 6-16 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 7 | 46.7 | 4 | 7 |
| 2013 Postseason | Stanford | 642 | 88 | 19.6 | 635 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 642 | 88 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 557 | 91.9 | 18.1 | -85 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 557 | 91.9 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Stanford | 383 | 75.7 | 16.1 | -174 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 383 | 75.7 | 16.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
125
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · Stanford
642 primary output · 88 efficiency · 19.6 usage
68.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · Stanford
68.5
642 primary · 88 efficiency · 19.6 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Stanford
68.2
557 primary · 91.9 efficiency · 18.1 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,589
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.