Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Toledo paired 2,981 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Phillip Ely College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 3,569
- Passing yards
- 3,548
- Rushing yards
- 21
- Touchdowns
- 29
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 3 | 40 | 42 | -2 | 1 | 30.4 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 2 | 548 | 541 | 7 | 4 | 46.2 |
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 12 | 277 | 285 | -8 | 2 | 62.8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 12 | 2,704 | 2,680 | 24 | 22 | 62.8 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Toledo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Toledo
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
248.4
Efficiency
56.9
Usage
5.4
Consistency
82.1
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 277. Arkansas: 240. Iowa State: 146. Arkansas State: 313. Ball State: 168. Kent State: 218. Eastern Michigan: 319. Massachusetts: 361. Northern Illinois: 133. Central Michigan: 319. Bowling Green: 207. Western Michigan: 280
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 29 by 64.1. Arkansas: 39 by 59.3. Iowa State: 30 by 51.5. Arkansas State: 54 by 53.7. Ball State: 24 by 54.6. Kent State: 35 by 64. Eastern Michigan: 28 by 66.7. Massachusetts: 48 by 63.2. Northern Illinois: 37 by 38.9. Central Michigan: 40 by 56.9. Bowling Green: 27 by 55.6. Western Michigan: 38 by 54.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins256.8 · Games = 10 · +50.3 vs Losses
Losses206.5 · Games = 2 · -50.3 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Phillip Ely
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.