Usage Score
5.4
Player Dossier
2011-2015Toledo
QB • 6'1" • Tampa, FL, USA
Phillip Ely is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
5.4
Efficiency
56.9
Consistency
82.1
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Phillip Ely, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Toledo. Phillip Ely is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Phillip Ely played QB for Alabama and Toledo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Phillip Ely recorded 3,548 passing yards, 21 rushing yards, and 29 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Toledo paired 2,981 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Toledo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
248.4
Efficiency
56.9
Usage
5.4
Consistency
82.1
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 277. Arkansas: 240. Iowa State: 146. Arkansas State: 313. Ball State: 168. Kent State: 218. Eastern Michigan: 319. Massachusetts: 361. Northern Illinois: 133. Central Michigan: 319. Bowling Green: 207. Western Michigan: 280
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 29 by 64.1. Arkansas: 39 by 59.3. Iowa State: 30 by 51.5. Arkansas State: 54 by 53.7. Ball State: 24 by 54.6. Kent State: 35 by 64. Eastern Michigan: 28 by 66.7. Massachusetts: 48 by 63.2. Northern Illinois: 37 by 38.9. Central Michigan: 40 by 56.9. Bowling Green: 27 by 55.6. Western Michigan: 38 by 54.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/23 | vs Temple | W 32-17 | 20 | 28 | 285 | 71.4 | 2 | 0 | 64.1 | 1 | -8 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Western Michigan | L 30-35 | 16 | 33 | 280 | 48.5 | 2 | 0 | 54.8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Tue 11/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-28 | 16 | 24 | 208 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 55.6 | 3 | -1 | -0.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Wed 11/11 | @ Central Michigan300-yard game | W 28-23 | 23 | 39 | 322 | 59.0 | 2 | 0 | 56.9 | 1 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed 11/4 | vs Northern Illinois | L 27-32 | 15 | 33 | 136 | 45.5 | 1 | 2 | 38.9 | 4 | -3 | -0.80 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Massachusetts300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 51-35 | 26 | 47 | 355 | 55.3 | 5 | 3 | 63.2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Eastern Michigan300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 63-20 | 18 | 27 | 327 | 66.7 | 4 | 0 | 66.7 | 1 | -8 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Kent State | W 38-7 | 19 | 32 | 205 | 59.4 | 2 | 0 | 64 | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Ball State | W 24-10 | 16 | 22 | 164 | 72.7 | 2 | 2 | 54.6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Arkansas State300-yard game | W 37-7 | 25 | 52 | 308 | 48.1 | 0 | 1 | 53.7 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Iowa State | W 30-23 | 11 | 28 | 138 | 39.3 | 1 | 1 | 51.5 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Arkansas | W 16-12 | 21 | 38 | 237 | 55.3 | 1 | 0 | 59.3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2011-2012
Opening stop
Toledo
2014-2015
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 40 | 56.5 | 2.1 | 40 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 548 | 62.4 | 14 | 508 |
| 2015 Postseason | Toledo | 2,981 | 56.9 | 5.4 | 2,433 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 2,981 | 56.9 | 5.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with 27 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
27
Primary metric
27 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Arkansas
15
Primary metric
Win with 15 yards of offense and 69.4 efficiency.
15 total offense with 69.4 efficiency.
#3
New Hampshire
360
Primary metric
Win with 360 yards of offense and 77.7 efficiency.
360 total offense with 77.7 efficiency.
#4
Massachusetts
361
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
361 total offense with 63.2 efficiency.
#5
Eastern Michigan
319
Primary metric
Win with 319 yards of offense and 66.7 efficiency.
319 total offense with 66.7 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Toledo
2,981 primary output · 56.9 efficiency · 5.4 usage
61.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Toledo
61.1
2,981 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 5.4 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
41.9
548 primary · 62.4 efficiency · 14 usage
7
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,569
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.