Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2011-2013South Carolina
Bruce Ellington
WR • 5'9" • Moncks Corner, SC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Bruce Ellington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.4
Consistency
56.1
Season Value
65.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · South Carolina
111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- South Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bruce Ellington, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · South Carolina. Bruce Ellington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
South Carolina paired 775 primary output with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · South Carolina
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
64.6
Efficiency
86.4
Usage
19.5
Consistency
56.1
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 140. North Carolina: 17. Georgia: 13. Vanderbilt: 111. UCF: 88. Kentucky: 7. Arkansas: 96. Missouri: 136. Mississippi State: 6. Florida: 67. Unknown: 43. Clemson: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 6 by 100. North Carolina: 1 by 100. Georgia: 1 by 86.7. Vanderbilt: 8 by 92.5. UCF: 4 by 100. Kentucky: 1 by 46.7. Arkansas: 6 by 100. Missouri: 10 by 90.7. Mississippi State: 1 by 40. Florida: 4 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 95.6. Clemson: 4 by 85
Split Comparison
Wins71.9 · n=10
First Half62.7 · n=6 · -3.8 vs Second Half
Second Half66.5 · n=6 · +3.8 vs First Half
All Games64.6 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Wisconsin100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 34-24 | — | 6 | 140 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 2 | 39 |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Clemson | W 31-17 | — | 4 | 51 | 11.6 | 12.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Florida | W 19-14 | — | 4 | 67 | 14.4 | 16.80 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Mississippi State | W 34-16 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Missouri100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-24 | — | 10 | 136 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 2 | 23 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Arkansas2+ TD | W 52-7 | — | 6 | 96 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 53 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Kentucky | W 35-28 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ UCF | W 28-25 | — | 4 | 88 | 18 | 22 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-25 | — | 8 | 111 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Georgia | L 30-41 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs North Carolina | W 27-10 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Carolina
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | South Carolina | 211 | 62.7 | 15.3 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | South Carolina | 211 | 62.7 | 15.3 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | South Carolina | 600 | 88.9 | 20.3 | 389 |
| 2012 Regular Season | South Carolina | 600 | 88.9 | 20.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | South Carolina | 775 | 86.4 | 19.5 | 175 |
| 2013 Regular Season | South Carolina | 775 | 86.4 | 19.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tennessee
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · South Carolina
775 primary output · 86.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage
65.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · South Carolina
65.5
775 primary · 86.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · South Carolina
62.3
600 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 20.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9185
Erasmus Hall · Brooklyn, NY
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,586
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.